From: "Andrey Panin" <pazke@orbita1.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (x86_64)
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:35:55 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021224063555.GF1222@pazke> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021224063036.GD1222@pazke>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
x86_64 specific patch attached. Not tested, not compiled.
--
Andrey Panin | Embedded systems software developer
pazke@orbita1.ru | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
[-- Attachment #2: patch-irq-x86_64 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 11471 bytes --]
diff --minimal -urN -X /usr/share/dontdiff linux-2.5.52.vanilla/arch/x86_64/Kconfig linux-2.5.52/arch/x86_64/Kconfig
--- linux-2.5.52.vanilla/arch/x86_64/Kconfig Thu Dec 19 20:02:33 2002
+++ linux-2.5.52/arch/x86_64/Kconfig Tue Dec 24 20:40:18 2002
@@ -25,6 +25,10 @@
486, 586, Pentiums, and various instruction-set-compatible chips by
AMD, Cyrix, and others.
+config GENERIC_IRQ
+ bool
+ default y
+
config MMU
bool
default y
diff --minimal -urN -X /usr/share/dontdiff linux-2.5.52.vanilla/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c linux-2.5.52/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c
--- linux-2.5.52.vanilla/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c Thu Nov 28 01:35:59 2002
+++ linux-2.5.52/arch/x86_64/kernel/irq.c Tue Dec 24 20:33:47 2002
@@ -62,65 +62,9 @@
* interrupt controllers, without having to do assembly magic.
*/
-/*
- * Controller mappings for all interrupt sources:
- */
-irq_desc_t irq_desc[NR_IRQS] __cacheline_aligned =
- { [0 ... NR_IRQS-1] = { 0, &no_irq_type, NULL, 0, SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED}};
-
static void register_irq_proc (unsigned int irq);
-/*
- * Special irq handlers.
- */
-
-void no_action(int cpl, void *dev_id, struct pt_regs *regs) { }
-
-/*
- * Generic no controller code
- */
-static void enable_none(unsigned int irq) { }
-static unsigned int startup_none(unsigned int irq) { return 0; }
-static void disable_none(unsigned int irq) { }
-static void ack_none(unsigned int irq)
-{
-/*
- * 'what should we do if we get a hw irq event on an illegal vector'.
- * each architecture has to answer this themselves, it doesnt deserve
- * a generic callback i think.
- */
-#if CONFIG_X86
- printk("unexpected IRQ trap at vector %02x\n", irq);
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
- /*
- * Currently unexpected vectors happen only on SMP and APIC.
- * We _must_ ack these because every local APIC has only N
- * irq slots per priority level, and a 'hanging, unacked' IRQ
- * holds up an irq slot - in excessive cases (when multiple
- * unexpected vectors occur) that might lock up the APIC
- * completely.
- */
- ack_APIC_irq();
-#endif
-#endif
-}
-
-/* startup is the same as "enable", shutdown is same as "disable" */
-#define shutdown_none disable_none
-#define end_none enable_none
-
-struct hw_interrupt_type no_irq_type = {
- "none",
- startup_none,
- shutdown_none,
- enable_none,
- disable_none,
- ack_none,
- end_none
-};
-
-atomic_t irq_err_count;
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
#ifdef APIC_MISMATCH_DEBUG
atomic_t irq_mis_count;
@@ -179,129 +123,6 @@
return 0;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-inline void synchronize_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- while (irq_desc[irq].status & IRQ_INPROGRESS)
- cpu_relax();
-}
-#endif
-
-/*
- * This should really return information about whether
- * we should do bottom half handling etc. Right now we
- * end up _always_ checking the bottom half, which is a
- * waste of time and is not what some drivers would
- * prefer.
- */
-int handle_IRQ_event(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs * regs, struct irqaction * action)
-{
- int status = 1; /* Force the "do bottom halves" bit */
-
- if (!(action->flags & SA_INTERRUPT))
- local_irq_enable();
-
- do {
- status |= action->flags;
- action->handler(irq, action->dev_id, regs);
- action = action->next;
- } while (action);
- if (status & SA_SAMPLE_RANDOM)
- add_interrupt_randomness(irq);
- local_irq_disable();
-
- return status;
-}
-
-/*
- * Generic enable/disable code: this just calls
- * down into the PIC-specific version for the actual
- * hardware disable after having gotten the irq
- * controller lock.
- */
-
-/**
- * disable_irq_nosync - disable an irq without waiting
- * @irq: Interrupt to disable
- *
- * Disable the selected interrupt line. Disables and Enables are
- * nested.
- * Unlike disable_irq(), this function does not ensure existing
- * instances of the IRQ handler have completed before returning.
- *
- * This function must not be called from IRQ context.
- */
-
-inline void disable_irq_nosync(unsigned int irq)
-{
- irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + irq;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
- if (!desc->depth++) {
- desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
- desc->handler->disable(irq);
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
-}
-
-/**
- * disable_irq - disable an irq and wait for completion
- * @irq: Interrupt to disable
- *
- * Disable the selected interrupt line. Enables and Disables are
- * nested.
- * This function waits for any pending IRQ handlers for this interrupt
- * to complete before returning. If you use this function while
- * holding a resource the IRQ handler may need you will deadlock.
- *
- * This function may be called - with care - from IRQ context.
- */
-
-void disable_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- disable_irq_nosync(irq);
- synchronize_irq(irq);
-}
-
-/**
- * enable_irq - enable handling of an irq
- * @irq: Interrupt to enable
- *
- * Undoes the effect of one call to disable_irq(). If this
- * matches the last disable, processing of interrupts on this
- * IRQ line is re-enabled.
- *
- * This function may be called from IRQ context.
- */
-
-void enable_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + irq;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
- switch (desc->depth) {
- case 1: {
- unsigned int status = desc->status & ~IRQ_DISABLED;
- desc->status = status;
- if ((status & (IRQ_PENDING | IRQ_REPLAY)) == IRQ_PENDING) {
- desc->status = status | IRQ_REPLAY;
- hw_resend_irq(desc->handler,irq);
- }
- desc->handler->enable(irq);
- /* fall-through */
- }
- default:
- desc->depth--;
- break;
- case 0:
- printk("enable_irq(%u) unbalanced from %p\n", irq,
- __builtin_return_address(0));
- }
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
-}
-
/*
* do_IRQ handles all normal device IRQ's (the special
* SMP cross-CPU interrupts have their own specific
@@ -523,197 +344,6 @@
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock,flags);
return;
}
-}
-
-/*
- * IRQ autodetection code..
- *
- * This depends on the fact that any interrupt that
- * comes in on to an unassigned handler will get stuck
- * with "IRQ_WAITING" cleared and the interrupt
- * disabled.
- */
-
-static DECLARE_MUTEX(probe_sem);
-
-/**
- * probe_irq_on - begin an interrupt autodetect
- *
- * Commence probing for an interrupt. The interrupts are scanned
- * and a mask of potential interrupt lines is returned.
- *
- */
-
-unsigned long probe_irq_on(void)
-{
- unsigned int i;
- irq_desc_t *desc;
- unsigned long val;
- unsigned long delay;
-
- down(&probe_sem);
- /*
- * something may have generated an irq long ago and we want to
- * flush such a longstanding irq before considering it as spurious.
- */
- for (i = NR_IRQS-1; i > 0; i--) {
- desc = irq_desc + i;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
- if (!irq_desc[i].action)
- irq_desc[i].handler->startup(i);
- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
- }
-
- /* Wait for longstanding interrupts to trigger. */
- for (delay = jiffies + HZ/50; time_after(delay, jiffies); )
- /* about 20ms delay */ barrier();
-
- /*
- * enable any unassigned irqs
- * (we must startup again here because if a longstanding irq
- * happened in the previous stage, it may have masked itself)
- */
- for (i = NR_IRQS-1; i > 0; i--) {
- desc = irq_desc + i;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
- if (!desc->action) {
- desc->status |= IRQ_AUTODETECT | IRQ_WAITING;
- if (desc->handler->startup(i))
- desc->status |= IRQ_PENDING;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
- }
-
- /*
- * Wait for spurious interrupts to trigger
- */
- for (delay = jiffies + HZ/10; time_after(delay, jiffies); )
- /* about 100ms delay */ barrier();
-
- /*
- * Now filter out any obviously spurious interrupts
- */
- val = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
- irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + i;
- unsigned int status;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
- status = desc->status;
-
- if (status & IRQ_AUTODETECT) {
- /* It triggered already - consider it spurious. */
- if (!(status & IRQ_WAITING)) {
- desc->status = status & ~IRQ_AUTODETECT;
- desc->handler->shutdown(i);
- } else
- if (i < 32)
- val |= 1 << i;
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
- }
-
- return val;
-}
-
-/*
- * Return a mask of triggered interrupts (this
- * can handle only legacy ISA interrupts).
- */
-
-/**
- * probe_irq_mask - scan a bitmap of interrupt lines
- * @val: mask of interrupts to consider
- *
- * Scan the ISA bus interrupt lines and return a bitmap of
- * active interrupts. The interrupt probe logic state is then
- * returned to its previous value.
- *
- * Note: we need to scan all the irq's even though we will
- * only return ISA irq numbers - just so that we reset them
- * all to a known state.
- */
-unsigned int probe_irq_mask(unsigned long val)
-{
- int i;
- unsigned int mask;
-
- mask = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
- irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + i;
- unsigned int status;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
- status = desc->status;
-
- if (status & IRQ_AUTODETECT) {
- if (i < 16 && !(status & IRQ_WAITING))
- mask |= 1 << i;
-
- desc->status = status & ~IRQ_AUTODETECT;
- desc->handler->shutdown(i);
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
- }
- up(&probe_sem);
-
- return mask & val;
-}
-
-/*
- * Return the one interrupt that triggered (this can
- * handle any interrupt source).
- */
-
-/**
- * probe_irq_off - end an interrupt autodetect
- * @val: mask of potential interrupts (unused)
- *
- * Scans the unused interrupt lines and returns the line which
- * appears to have triggered the interrupt. If no interrupt was
- * found then zero is returned. If more than one interrupt is
- * found then minus the first candidate is returned to indicate
- * their is doubt.
- *
- * The interrupt probe logic state is returned to its previous
- * value.
- *
- * BUGS: When used in a module (which arguably shouldnt happen)
- * nothing prevents two IRQ probe callers from overlapping. The
- * results of this are non-optimal.
- */
-
-int probe_irq_off(unsigned long val)
-{
- int i, irq_found, nr_irqs;
-
- nr_irqs = 0;
- irq_found = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
- irq_desc_t *desc = irq_desc + i;
- unsigned int status;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&desc->lock);
- status = desc->status;
-
- if (status & IRQ_AUTODETECT) {
- if (!(status & IRQ_WAITING)) {
- if (!nr_irqs)
- irq_found = i;
- nr_irqs++;
- }
- desc->status = status & ~IRQ_AUTODETECT;
- desc->handler->shutdown(i);
- }
- spin_unlock_irq(&desc->lock);
- }
- up(&probe_sem);
-
- if (nr_irqs > 1)
- irq_found = -irq_found;
- return irq_found;
}
/* this was setup_x86_irq but it seems pretty generic */
diff --minimal -urN -X /usr/share/dontdiff linux-2.5.52.vanilla/include/asm-x86_64/hw_irq.h linux-2.5.52/include/asm-x86_64/hw_irq.h
--- linux-2.5.52.vanilla/include/asm-x86_64/hw_irq.h Thu Nov 28 01:36:22 2002
+++ linux-2.5.52/include/asm-x86_64/hw_irq.h Tue Dec 24 21:56:04 2002
@@ -182,4 +182,21 @@
#endif
+/*
+ * Currently unexpected vectors happen only on SMP and APIC.
+ * We _must_ ack these because every local APIC has only N
+ * irq slots per priority level, and a 'hanging, unacked' IRQ
+ * holds up an irq slot - in excessive cases (when multiple
+ * unexpected vectors occur) that might lock up the APIC
+ * completely.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
+#define ack_bad_irq(irq) ack_APIC_irq()
+#else
+#define ack_bad_irq(irq) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
+/* Return a pointer to the irq descriptor for IRQ. */
+#define irq_desc(irq) (irq_desc + (irq))
+
#endif /* _ASM_HW_IRQ_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-24 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-24 6:30 [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (i386) Andrey Panin
2002-12-24 6:33 ` [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (v850) Andrey Panin
2002-12-24 6:35 ` Andrey Panin [this message]
2002-12-24 6:45 ` [RFC] irq handling code consolidation (alpha) Andrey Panin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021224063555.GF1222@pazke \
--to=pazke@orbita1.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.