From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 07:25:00 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Pantelis Antoniou Cc: Paul Mackerras , linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, Dan Malek Subject: Re: New style dpalloc/hostalloc routines (diff). Message-ID: <20021224142500.GE889@opus.bloom.county> References: <3E006C94.2090503@intracom.gr> <15874.23846.177956.192840@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <3E02E984.8090904@intracom.gr> <20021223164928.GF15397@opus.bloom.county> <3E080647.8060407@intracom.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3E080647.8060407@intracom.gr> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 09:01:27AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 11:57:24AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > > > > > >>Here is the updated patch in diff format as per your suggestions. > >> > > > >Looks good. My only real issue is that this is a big change, so I would > >rather see either (or both) of the following happen: > >Make a patch vs 2.5. This will require additional 8xx work to get > >things going again. > >Please hold on this until all of the otherwise stable 8xx work can get > >out of the linuxppc_2_4_devel tree and into linuxppc_2_4 / Marcelo. > > > >Also, Dan Malek, any comments on all of this? > > > Well, I'll try but I haven't messed with 2.5 yet. > Does it even work at all for 8xx? No, it does not. As I said above, it needs a few fixups here and there. > Has anybody in the list worked with it? On all of the other types of boards, yes. -- Tom Rini (TR1265) http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/