From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.53 with contest
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 10:37:45 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212261038.04015.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are some contest results using osdl hardware:
Uniprocessor:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 70.0 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.50 [5] 69.9 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.51 [2] 69.8 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.52 [3] 70.2 96 0 0 1.05
2.5.53 [7] 70.1 96 0 0 1.05
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 67.4 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.50 [5] 67.3 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.51 [2] 67.2 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.52 [3] 67.5 99 0 0 1.01
2.5.53 [7] 67.6 99 0 0 1.01
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28
2.5.50 [5] 84.8 79 17 19 1.27
2.5.51 [2] 85.2 79 17 20 1.28
2.5.52 [3] 84.4 79 17 19 1.26
2.5.53 [7] 86.9 77 18 21 1.30
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 106.1 82 2 9 1.59
2.5.50 [5] 107.5 81 3 9 1.61
2.5.51 [7] 107.0 81 3 9 1.60
2.5.52 [3] 109.8 81 2 8 1.64
2.5.53 [7] 107.4 81 3 9 1.61
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 184.8 70 3 8 2.77
2.5.50 [5] 189.5 61 4 9 2.84
2.5.51 [7] 163.7 67 3 8 2.45
2.5.52 [3] 161.4 69 3 8 2.42
2.5.53 [7] 151.0 69 3 8 2.26
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 127.4 57 14 13 1.91
2.5.50 [5] 142.6 54 19 14 2.14
2.5.51 [7] 125.6 58 14 12 1.88
2.5.52 [7] 120.9 60 13 12 1.81
2.5.53 [7] 113.9 63 12 12 1.71
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 97.4 75 7 11 1.46
2.5.50 [5] 106.9 69 10 11 1.60
2.5.51 [7] 105.1 69 9 11 1.57
2.5.52 [7] 94.9 76 7 10 1.42
2.5.53 [7] 99.5 73 8 10 1.49
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 88.2 80 15 6 1.32
2.5.50 [5] 88.5 80 15 7 1.33
2.5.51 [2] 88.4 80 15 7 1.32
2.5.52 [3] 88.1 80 15 7 1.32
2.5.53 [7] 88.2 80 15 6 1.32
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 81.4 85 0 8 1.22
2.5.50 [5] 81.2 85 0 8 1.22
2.5.51 [2] 80.8 85 0 8 1.21
2.5.52 [3] 81.0 86 0 9 1.21
2.5.53 [7] 81.5 85 0 9 1.22
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 98.1 76 43 2 1.47
2.5.50 [5] 98.3 76 44 2 1.47
2.5.51 [7] 99.3 76 45 2 1.49
2.5.52 [3] 100.0 78 45 2 1.50
2.5.53 [7] 98.7 80 44 2 1.48
Faster compile times in io_load and xtar_load compared to 2.5.52
SMP:
noload:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.50 [5] 39.3 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.51 [3] 39.6 180 0 0 1.09
2.5.52 [7] 39.3 181 0 0 1.09
2.5.53 [7] 39.4 181 0 0 1.09
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.50 [5] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.51 [3] 36.5 195 0 0 1.01
2.5.52 [7] 36.5 194 0 0 1.01
2.5.53 [7] 36.6 194 0 0 1.01
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [6] 50.0 141 11 52 1.38
2.5.50 [5] 47.8 148 10 46 1.32
2.5.51 [3] 50.5 139 12 54 1.39
2.5.52 [7] 48.7 144 10 49 1.34
2.5.53 [7] 47.4 149 9 44 1.31
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
1d3 [1] 57.3 164 1 10 1.58
2.5.49 [5] 53.8 161 1 10 1.49
2.5.50 [5] 54.6 157 1 10 1.51
2.5.51 [7] 58.2 158 1 10 1.61
2.5.52 [7] 56.1 161 1 10 1.55
2.5.53 [7] 56.2 159 1 10 1.55
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 72.9 132 1 10 2.01
2.5.50 [5] 116.2 103 2 10 3.21
2.5.51 [7] 104.8 124 2 10 2.89
2.5.52 [7] 83.1 138 1 9 2.29
2.5.53 [7] 82.9 129 1 9 2.29
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 75.5 110 9 18 2.09
2.5.50 [5] 87.6 102 14 22 2.42
2.5.51 [7] 84.6 102 13 21 2.34
2.5.52 [7] 73.1 111 10 19 2.02
2.5.53 [7] 80.0 104 12 21 2.21
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 64.2 130 8 19 1.77
2.5.50 [5] 59.3 139 7 18 1.64
2.5.51 [7] 64.5 134 7 18 1.78
2.5.52 [7] 75.1 120 10 21 2.07
2.5.53 [7] 73.6 123 10 21 2.03
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 49.1 152 5 7 1.36
2.5.50 [5] 49.3 151 5 7 1.36
2.5.51 [3] 48.5 154 5 7 1.34
2.5.52 [7] 49.4 151 5 7 1.36
2.5.53 [7] 50.7 151 5 7 1.40
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.50 [5] 43.4 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.51 [3] 43.5 167 0 8 1.20
2.5.52 [7] 43.2 167 0 9 1.19
2.5.53 [7] 43.7 166 0 9 1.21
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.49 [5] 62.5 145 35 3 1.73
2.5.50 [5] 63.3 141 36 3 1.75
2.5.51 [7] 62.6 148 38 3 1.73
2.5.52 [7] 63.5 148 38 3 1.75
2.5.53 [7] 63.2 144 37 3 1.75
Small plus here, minus there, no major change in SMP results compared to
2.5.52
Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+CkFOF6dfvkL3i1gRAhHTAKCDlP8wKV1VLgmBuKcZuSc4WdfU4ACeMbcp
CRNV51mhYF0NVYb5lxZVQBo=
=nxlk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next reply other threads:[~2002-12-25 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-25 23:37 Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-01-07 19:44 ` [BENCHMARK] 2.5.53 with contest Rob Landley
2003-01-08 20:32 ` Con Kolivas
2003-01-10 17:54 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212261038.04015.conman@kolivas.net \
--to=conman@kolivas.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.