From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE0080c82c70ca.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.48.41]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4604829 for ; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 13:36:58 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:36:59 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: Richard Hirst Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Who wrote the parisc gdb support? Message-ID: <20021227203659.GC1014@systemhalted> References: <20021227020711.GC8363@systemhalted> <20021227062018.GD6159@dsl2.external.hp.com> <20021227110244.GY24337@sleepie.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20021227110244.GY24337@sleepie.demon.co.uk> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > > Taggart said it was dhd and amodra mostly. > > I think he is right. > > IIRC, Most, if not all, of the work was funded by HP under contract > > with Linuxcare in fall 2000 and spring 2001. > > I'd agree with that. At one time I worked on kernel support for it, > while amodra worked on gdb itself. We were both working for Linuxcare, > under contract to HP at the time. > That's good then, since the chain of copyright now goes like this: Linuxcare -> HP -> FSF It's rogue hackers without copyright assignment that do more than trivial patches that worry me... not naming any names *cough* tausq *cough* Though that person now has all the papers in place ;) c.