From: John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>
To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Want a random entropy source?
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 17:15:46 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200212281715.gBSHFkf3001354@darkstar.example.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021228164750.A5217@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> from "Russell King" at Dec 28, 2002 04:47:50 PM
> > I have never understood how a 16-bit DAC or ADC can have noise above
> > 96 dB. Surely _by definition_ a 16-bit DAC or ADC is one that does
> > not have noise above that level.
>
> You're assuming that the ADC input is coupled to a noiseless source.
> Most ADCs have a chunk of analogue circuitry just before them which
> is a nice source of noise.
>
> Not only will noise be picked up via disconnected inputs, but it will
> also be picked up via the power supply and ground connections to that
> analogue circuit. How much of that noise gets into the ADC input is
> dependent on the quality, design and physical layout of the analogue
> circuit.
Right... So basically it can be claimed to be a 16-bit ADC as long as
it is noiseless above 96 dB, when all of the inputs to the ADC are
correctly terminated directly at the ADC inputs.
I just think it's funny that loads of "16-bit" soundcards are
effectively only 12-bit soundcards :-). Especially as that's about
the noise-floor of good quality vinyl :-).
> (As a side note, it's interesting that (what used to be) Crystal
> Semiconductor published a large chunk of information on the layout of
> boards including the routing of power supplies for combined digital
> and analogue circuits (and ADCs fall into that category.))
Good idea - I'd be grateful if more manufacturers would supply a
datasheet at all :-).
John.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-28 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-27 16:16 two 2.5 modules bugs Mikael Pettersson
2002-12-27 23:24 ` Petr Vandrovec
2002-12-28 10:37 ` Rusty Russell
2002-12-28 15:40 ` Want a random entropy source? Stephen Satchell
2002-12-28 16:00 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 16:38 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-12-28 16:47 ` Russell King
2002-12-28 17:15 ` John Bradford [this message]
2002-12-28 20:28 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-12-28 20:39 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 20:53 ` Folkert van Heusden
2002-12-28 23:20 ` Stephen Satchell
2002-12-28 23:41 ` John Bradford
2002-12-28 20:27 ` Folkert van Heusden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200212281715.gBSHFkf3001354@darkstar.example.net \
--to=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.