All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kaleb Pederson <kibab@icehouse.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: windows=stable, linux=5 reboots/50 min
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 06:28:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200301070628.17747.kibab@icehouse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030107095406.GH2141@vagabond>

[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1229 bytes --]

I'm now pretty sure that it is a hardware failure of some type.  Windows was 
stable last night for about four hours of compiling, graphics manipulations, 
etc.  But, when I got home after being gone for several hours, Windows 
started exhibiting the same behavior.  I presume it is Linux sensitivity to 
hardware that made it show up 5 days sooner.  I'm presume, at this point, 
that it is either the motherboard or one of the processors.

Thank you everyone for your suggestions.  Of the many messages I received, the 
following were good and relevant to my system and I will try them to see if 
it does make a difference.

1) Try disabling apm/acpi in bios (I had done this in the kernel, not in 
bios).
2) Try a uniprocessor kernel or booting with only one processor
3) mount /var synchronous to see if anything shows up in the logs (I had 
checked the logs and nothing was getting written to it.  I had forgotten that 
you could make the whole file system synchronous; I'll try this.)
4) Increase voltage to the processors and see if it helps.

Per some other questions, I'm not using scsi nor do I have an intel 82801DB 
chip onboard.

Thanks again for the help.

--Kaleb
PS: Please CC me any responses that go to the list.

[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-07 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-07  6:57 windows=stable, linux=5 reboots/50 min Kaleb Pederson
2003-01-06 19:12 ` Adam Belay
2003-01-06 23:52 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-07  4:42 ` Billy Rose
2003-01-07  5:28 ` Billy Rose
2003-01-07  9:54 ` Jan Hudec
2003-01-07 14:28   ` Kaleb Pederson [this message]
2003-01-07 16:22 ` Bernd Schubert
2003-01-07 21:57 ` Andreas Tscharner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-07  9:19 Kaleb Pederson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200301070628.17747.kibab@icehouse.net \
    --to=kibab@icehouse.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.