From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 08 Jan 2003 19:34:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ftp.mips.com ([IPv6:::ffff:206.31.31.227]:451 "EHLO mx2.mips.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:34:04 +0000 Received: from newman.mips.com (ns-dmz [206.31.31.225]) by mx2.mips.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h08JXH67023968; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:33:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from uhler-linux.mips.com (uhler-linux [192.168.11.222]) by newman.mips.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA15398; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:33:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from uhler-linux.mips.com (uhler@localhost) by uhler-linux.mips.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h08JX1F09754; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 11:33:01 -0800 Message-Id: <200301081933.h08JX1F09754@uhler-linux.mips.com> X-Authentication-Warning: uhler-linux.mips.com: uhler owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" cc: Dominic Sweetman , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org cc: uhler@mips.com Reply-To: uhler@mips.com Subject: Re: [patch] Use XKPHYS for 64-bit TLB flushes In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 2003 20:18:46 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 11:33:01 -0800 From: "Mike Uhler" Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 1100 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: uhler@mips.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips > > They do are different: KSEG0+entry*0x2000, likewise for XKPHYS -- see the > patch. This is precisely what we use for our internal testing (which is also exported to MIPS32 and MIPS64 architecture licensees) to initialize the TLB. I have not yet seen a case where this fails, and would be interested in hearing about any case where it does fail. /gmu -- =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= Michael Uhler, VP, Systems, Architecture, and Software Products MIPS Technologies, Inc. Email: uhler@mips.com Pager: uhler_p@mips.com 1225 Charleston Road Voice: (650)567-5025 FAX: (650)567-5225 Mountain View, CA 94043 Mobile: (650)868-6870 Admin: (650)567-5085 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <200301081933.h08JX1F09754@uhler-linux.mips.com> Reply-To: uhler@mips.com Subject: Re: [patch] Use XKPHYS for 64-bit TLB flushes In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Jan 2003 20:18:46 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 11:33:01 -0800 From: "Mike Uhler" Return-Path: Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Dominic Sweetman , Ralf Baechle , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, uhler@mips.com Message-ID: <20030108193301.X22jIDJINIt1QTyBdX1zS-_b01gZ_mITLAJYaFwLvFA@z> > > They do are different: KSEG0+entry*0x2000, likewise for XKPHYS -- see the > patch. This is precisely what we use for our internal testing (which is also exported to MIPS32 and MIPS64 architecture licensees) to initialize the TLB. I have not yet seen a case where this fails, and would be interested in hearing about any case where it does fail. /gmu -- =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*= Michael Uhler, VP, Systems, Architecture, and Software Products MIPS Technologies, Inc. Email: uhler@mips.com Pager: uhler_p@mips.com 1225 Charleston Road Voice: (650)567-5025 FAX: (650)567-5225 Mountain View, CA 94043 Mobile: (650)868-6870 Admin: (650)567-5085