From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: observations on 2.5 config screens
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 19:50:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030108195000.GA670@codemonkey.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1030108132758.22872B-100000@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> I guess, depending on your definition of fundemental. I would put any
> option which affects the kernel as a whole in that category, myself.
> Compiling with frame pointers comes to mind, since every object file is
> changed and there are performance implications as well.
No-one other than kernel hackers should be playing with that option,
hence it's in the kernel hacking menu.
> Processor option would select the processor and any architecture dependent
> options, I would think. Something like "kernel characteristics" could have
> options like smp.
SMP isn't a processor option ?
Dave
--
| Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| SuSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-08 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-01 19:55 observations on 2.5 config screens Robert P. J. Day
2003-01-01 20:07 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-01-01 20:15 ` Robert P. J. Day
2003-01-01 20:26 ` John Bradford
2003-01-02 1:55 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-02 2:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
2003-01-02 4:10 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-01-02 2:54 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-01-07 23:07 ` [2.5 patch] MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD must depend on MODULE_UNLOAD Adrian Bunk
2003-01-08 12:05 ` Rusty Russell
2003-01-07 23:30 ` observations on 2.5 config screens Adrian Bunk
2003-01-07 23:42 ` Robert Love
2003-01-08 0:14 ` Russell King
2003-01-08 14:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-08 15:53 ` Robert Love
2003-01-08 18:36 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-08 19:50 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2003-01-08 22:49 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-09 12:50 ` Dave Jones
2003-01-09 16:12 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-09 13:38 ` Ruslan U. Zakirov
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301011435300.27623-100000@dell.qualified-at.bofh.it>
2003-01-02 23:50 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030108195000.GA670@codemonkey.org.uk \
--to=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.