From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: Philip Dodd <smpcomputing@free.fr>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UnitedLinux violating GPL?
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:27:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030110002705.GZ6626@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1DFB8E.9050805@free.fr>
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 11:45:34PM +0100, Philip Dodd wrote:
> With all due respect, I believe that the terms of the GPL only require
> them to make it available to people who have the binaries, and only then
> upon request.
>...
Why don't you _read_ the GPL instead of making wrong statements?
Section 3 clearly states that your "upon request" is wrong, the part
that matches here is:
b) Accompany it with a written offer, valid for at least three
years, to give any third party, for a charge no more than your
cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete
machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be
distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium
customarily used for software interchange; or,
> Cheers,
>
> Philip
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-10 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-09 22:27 UnitedLinux violating GPL? Jeff Garzik
2003-01-09 22:45 ` Philip Dodd
2003-01-10 0:27 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2003-01-10 0:36 ` Cort Dougan
2003-01-10 2:40 ` John Jasen
2003-01-10 2:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-01-10 19:05 ` Samuel Flory
2003-01-09 22:53 ` Cort Dougan
2003-01-09 23:00 ` Tom Sightler
2003-01-09 23:06 ` GertJan Spoelman
2003-01-09 23:19 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2003-01-09 23:23 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-01-10 10:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-01-17 20:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-01-09 23:45 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2003-01-09 22:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-01-10 1:22 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2003-01-10 0:31 ` Aaron T Porter
2003-01-10 8:34 ` Hubert Mantel
2003-01-10 10:46 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-01-11 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-10 10:55 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-10 12:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-01-11 16:34 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-11 19:27 ` David Woodhouse
2003-01-12 13:15 ` Hubert Mantel
2003-01-12 16:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-01-13 13:12 ` Dave Jones
2003-01-12 13:23 ` Horst von Brand
2003-01-11 10:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-11 11:00 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-01-11 14:46 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-10 12:25 Nicholas Berry
[not found] <20030109224013$6e5e@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <20030111110011$3252@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-01-11 11:51 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-11 14:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-01-11 14:44 ` Andi Kleen
2003-01-11 20:34 Protasevich, Natalie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030110002705.GZ6626@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=smpcomputing@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.