All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Brian Tinsley <btinsley@emageon.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>, Chris Wood <cwood@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 16:55:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030110005510.GH23814@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1E175A.1050109@emageon.com>

At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> Either pollwait tables (invisible in 2.4 and 2.5), kernel stacks of
>> threads (which don't get pae_pgd's and are hence invisible in 2.4
>> and 2.5), or pagecache, with a much higher likelihood of pagecache.

On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:44:10PM -0600, Brian Tinsley wrote:
> The "kernel stacks of threads" may have some bearing on my incarnation 
> of this problem. We have several heavily threaded Java applications 
> running at the time the live-locks occur. At our most problematic site, 
> one application has a bug that can cause hundreds of timer threads (I 
> mean like 800 or so!) to be "accidentally" created. This site is 
> scheduled for an upgrade either tonight or tomorrow, so I will leave the 
> system as it is and see if I can still cause the live-lock to manifest 
> itself after the upgrade.

There is no extant implementation of paged stacks yet. I'm working on
a different problem (mem_map on 64GB on 2.5.x). I probably won't have
time to implement it in the near future, I probably won't be doing it
vs. 2.4.x, and I won't have to if someone else does it first.


Bill

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-10  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-06 23:35 2.4.20, .text.lock.swap cpu usage? (ibm x440) Chris Wood
2003-01-06 23:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-06 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-09 17:17   ` Chris Wood
2003-01-09 20:18     ` Andrew Morton
2003-01-10  0:25       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  0:44         ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  0:55           ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2003-01-10 20:42       ` Chris Wood
2003-01-09  2:20 ` James Cleverdon
2003-01-09  2:57 ` William Lee Irwin III
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-10  3:17 Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  3:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  3:42   ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  3:54     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  4:08       ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  4:19         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  4:50           ` Brian Tinsley
2003-01-10  5:17             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-01-10  5:24             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-01-10  5:45               ` Brian Tinsley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030110005510.GH23814@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=btinsley@emageon.com \
    --cc=cwood@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.