From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:59:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:59:29 -0500 Received: from havoc.daloft.com ([64.213.145.173]:62417 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 20:59:29 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:08:08 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik To: Yan-Fa Li Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: FYI: Etherleak Message-ID: <20030110020808.GA18605@gtf.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 05:49:47PM -0800, Yan-Fa Li wrote: > An interesting report into frame-padding information leakage violations in > ethernet drivers. The authors use linux drivers in their examples. > > http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf Yes. All of those drivers are for ancient and/or obscure hardware except three: rtl8139, epic100, and via-rhine. There are fixes for those (and others) in testing right now, in fact :)