From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself.
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2003 22:51:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030110073328.A53D02C0DF@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "07 Jan 2003 14:36:54 +0900." <buoadid1pxl.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
In message <buoadid1pxl.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp> you write:
> Miles Bader <miles@lsi.nec.co.jp> writes:
> > When I try to build modules using 2.5.54, the resulting .ko files lack
> > the .gnu.linkonce.* sections, which causes the kernel module loader to
> > fail on them -- those sections _are_ present in the .o files, but the
> > linker apparently removes them!
>
> Ok, I found out why this is happening -- the v850 default linker
> scripts, for whatever reason, merge any section called `.gnu.linker.t*'
> with .text.
That's about as wierdass as it comes.
> I can prevent this by adding the option `--unique=.gnu.linkonce.this_module'
> to the linker flags (specifically, to LDFLAGS_MODULE in the top-level
> Makefile). I suppose another way to do it would be to rename the
> section something that doesn't match `.gnu.linker.t*'.
Or you could add this flag in arch/v850/Makefile.
> What's the right way to handle this?
>
> [from perusing the ld srcs, a few other archs seem to have the same
> `feature,' though the only that I think has linux support is `cris']
I think:
LDFLAGS_MODULE += -T arch/v850/module.lds
And include a linker script there which works.
Thanks for finding this...
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-10 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-27 10:25 [PATCH] Embed __this_module in module itself Rusty Russell
2003-01-06 11:03 ` Miles Bader
2003-01-07 5:36 ` Miles Bader
2003-01-08 11:51 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-01-08 20:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-09 1:18 ` Miles Bader
2003-01-09 18:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-01-09 19:16 ` Richard B. Johnson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-23 8:38 Rusty Russell
2002-12-23 9:21 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030110073328.A53D02C0DF@lists.samba.org \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.