From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Clausen Subject: Re: aal_assert() Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 00:36:57 +1100 Message-ID: <20030110133657.GE1056@gnu.org> References: <20021231005440.GA1573@gnu.org> <3E1E74C3.8050707@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E1E74C3.8050707@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Yury Umanets Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:22:43AM +0300, Yura Umanets wrote: > Actually there was the code earlier like you have proposed. And it was > changed to the current state due to the following reasons: > > * there are two developers working on reiser4progs currentry (Vitaly > Fertman and Yury Umanets). And our parts is much different. So, each of > us should work on own code. > * there is not neccessary an assertion is corect and only the author can > decide is it correct. Well, that decision is made by the developers, not the users. Presumebly, you know who wrote what code. If an assertion is contentious (and 99.9% of them aren't), you should document *why*, anyway. > * NAMESYS has some development policies. And hints is the one of them. Why? Cheers, Andrew