Core dump in reiserfsck

Core dump in reiserfsck

[Vitaly Porotikov]

Folks,

  Perhaps 3.x1c have not this bug, but I can't do any changes in my
system. I send it in hope to find some coding errors out (if this wasn't
before).

[root@tkprzbkup5 /root]# mount
/dev/rza1 on / type ext2 (rw)
none on /proc type proc (rw)
none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/rze1 on /export type reiserfs (ro)
[root@tkprzbkup5 /root]# reiserfsck --check /dev/rze1

<-------------reiserfsck, 2002------------->
reiserfsprogs 3.x.1b

Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/rze1
Will put log info to 'stdout'

Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes):Yes
###########
reiserfsck --check started at Wed Jan 15 10:41:40 2003
###########
Filesystem seems mounted read-only. Skipping journal replay..
Checking S+tree../ 72 (of  98)/101 (of 153)/124 (of
156)bad_indirect_item: block 1907661: item 7659550 76756x1 IND (1), len
8, location 3056 entry count 0, fsck need 0, format new has a pointer 0
to the block 1 whichin tree already
bad_indirect_item: block 1907661: item 7659550 7675670 0x1 IND (1), len
8, location 3056 entry count 0, fsckd 0, format new has a pointer 1 to
the block 500 which is in tree already
bit 2535358884, bitsize 314620004
reiserfsck: bitmap.c:160: reiserfs_bitmap_test_bit: Assertion
`bit_number < bm->bm_bit_size' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)


--
Best regards,
  Vitaly

Re: Core dump in reiserfsck

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:08:26PM +0900, Vitaly Porotikov wrote:

>   Perhaps 3.x1c have not this bug, but I can't do any changes in my
> system. I send it in hope to find some coding errors out (if this wasn't
> before).

You you guessed right, this bug is long fixed.
Actually if you ever will decide to upgrade your reiserfsprogs (which is
recommended), pick 3.6.4 (or whatever will be latest at the time),
not 3.x.1c

Bye,
    Oleg

Re: Core dump in reiserfsck

[Yury Umanets]

Vitaly Porotikov wrote:

>Folks,
>
>  Perhaps 3.x1c have not this bug, but I can't do any changes in my
>system. I send it in hope to find some coding errors out (if this wasn't
>before).
>
>[root@tkprzbkup5 /root]# mount
>/dev/rza1 on / type ext2 (rw)
>none on /proc type proc (rw)
>none on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
>/dev/rze1 on /export type reiserfs (ro)
>[root@tkprzbkup5 /root]# reiserfsck --check /dev/rze1
>
><-------------reiserfsck, 2002------------->
>reiserfsprogs 3.x.1b
>
>Will read-only check consistency of the filesystem on /dev/rze1
>Will put log info to 'stdout'
>
>Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes):Yes
>###########
>reiserfsck --check started at Wed Jan 15 10:41:40 2003
>###########
>Filesystem seems mounted read-only. Skipping journal replay..
>Checking S+tree../ 72 (of  98)/101 (of 153)/124 (of
>156)bad_indirect_item: block 1907661: item 7659550 76756x1 IND (1), len
>8, location 3056 entry count 0, fsck need 0, format new has a pointer 0
>to the block 1 whichin tree already
>bad_indirect_item: block 1907661: item 7659550 7675670 0x1 IND (1), len
>8, location 3056 entry count 0, fsckd 0, format new has a pointer 1 to
>the block 500 which is in tree already
>bit 2535358884, bitsize 314620004
>reiserfsck: bitmap.c:160: reiserfs_bitmap_test_bit: Assertion
>`bit_number < bm->bm_bit_size' failed.
>Aborted (core dumped)
>
>
>--
>Best regards,
>  Vitaly
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
Use more recent version please.
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfsprogs/reiserfsprogs-3.6.4.tar.gz

-- 
Yury Umanets