From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from systemhalted (CPE00207807b093-CM.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.112.180.230]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DB04829 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:27:35 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:27:35 -0500 From: Carlos O'Donell To: John David Anglin Cc: leandro.farinati@hp.com, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] 64 userspace Message-ID: <20030115192735.GE20519@systemhalted> References: <20030115190154.GA20519@systemhalted> <200301151917.h0FJH1v8021988@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200301151917.h0FJH1v8021988@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: > > I thought we had a 64-bit binutils port? > > There enough to build kernels, static binaries, ... The linker is really > the problem. First, we would need the processor/os specific ELF > specification. The handling of function pointers is another key part > as it affects how shared libraries are implemented and the dynamic loader. Okay. Were on the same page :) > I don't see the gcc issues as major as we have the code generation part > pretty much under control. Yup :) c.