Re: lots of calls to __write/read_lock_failed

[Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 04:47:30AM +0000, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:18:13PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >  file_table:_raw_read_lock() 3300000
> >  Call Trace:
> >   [<c0152469>] fget+0x9d/0xa0
> >   [<c0152b27>] sys_fsync+0x21/0xbe
> >   [<c0151b53>] sys_writev+0x47/0x56
> >   [<c010931f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 
> read_lock(&file->files_lock);

You mean read_lock(&files->file_lock); :)

Dave, does your webserver benchmark clone() tasks with CLONE_FILES ? Unless
the fd table is shared, can't see why there would be contention on this.
If it is indeed necessary to share fd table, then there is a somewhat
unmaintained lockfree fget() patch (files_struct_rcu) that you might want
to try.

> 
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:18:13PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > time:_raw_write_lock() 1350000
> > Call Trace:
> >  [<c010f321>] timer_interrupt+0x99/0x9c
> >  [<c010b150>] handle_IRQ_event+0x38/0x5c
> 
> read_lock_irqsave(&xtime_lock, flags)
> or
> write_lock_irq(&xtime_lock);

ISTR a patch from Stephen Hemminger at OSDL that used Andrea's
sequence number trick based rwlock (frlock) to implement do_gettimeofday.
It might be relevant here.

Thanks
Dipankar