From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleg Drokin <green@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: [ANNOUNCE]: reiser4 snapshot
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:22:54 +0300
Message-ID: <20030116112254.A7254@namesys.com>
References: <15880.36350.410391.708308@laputa.namesys.com> <20030116091420.G7526@humilis>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12371-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030116091420.G7526@humilis>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Ookhoi <ookhoi@humilis.net>
Cc: Nikita Danilov <Nikita@namesys.com>, Reiserfs mail-list <Reiserfs-List@namesys.com>, Reiserfs developers mail-list <Reiserfs-Dev@namesys.com>

Hello!

On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Ookhoi wrote:

> Is there also a BK repository with the reiserfs4-progs?

Sure.
bk://thebsh.namesys.com/bk/reiser4progs

> And what is the right way to integrate reiser4 into the kernel? At the
> moment I pull reiser4 and linux-2.5, patch linux-2.5 with the
> reiser4.diff out of the snapshots dir, and replace fs/reiser4 with the
> BK reiser4. 
> This works*, but I think the patch part is not the right way.

Well. It is most right way actually. (besides pulling from our kernel
repository, but we have different UML-related stuff in there so that might not
be very good idea for you).
Probably starting with next snapshot there will be separate kernel patch
for people who would like to pull our tree directly out of bitkeeper.

> * I can compile a 2.5 kernel, boot it, and mkfs.reiser4 a partition.

Great success at our side! ;)
Though I see you have not tried to mount that?

Bye,
    Oleg