From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:55:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:198.149.18.6] ([IPv6:::ffff:198.149.18.6]:3255 "EHLO tolkor.sgi.com") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:55:21 +0000 Received: from ledzep.americas.sgi.com (ledzep.americas.sgi.com [192.48.203.134]) by tolkor.sgi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/linux-outbound_gateway-1.2) with ESMTP id h0MD3Ckq026605; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 07:03:12 -0600 Received: from daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.214]) by ledzep.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id GAA51502; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:55:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from taclab54.munich.sgi.com (taclab54.munich.sgi.com [144.253.195.54]) by daisy-e236.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.8) with ESMTP id GAA03246; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 06:55:11 -0600 (CST) Received: (from hch@localhost) by taclab54.munich.sgi.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h0MK9Jn32216; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:09:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:09:19 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Clausen , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, gnb@melbourne.sgi.com Subject: Re: debian's mips userland on mips64 Message-ID: <20030122150919.A32202@sgi.com> References: <20030122073006.GF6262@pureza.melbourne.sgi.com> <20030122124540.A31505@sgi.com> <20030122134506.A12847@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030122134506.A12847@linux-mips.org>; from ralf@linux-mips.org on Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:45:06PM +0100 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 1205 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: hch@sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:45:06PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > There is a 32-bit ptrace compatibility syscall already and last I tried > it was working quite well for strace. Indeed. Didn't even check whether mips64 has it already implemented..