From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 66-122-194-201.ded.pacbell.net ([IPv6:::ffff:66.122.194.201]:19328 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:41:21 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0MLlbQE001119 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:47:38 -0800 Received: (from lindahl@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h0MLlbgM001117 for linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:47:37 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: lindahl set sender to lindahl@keyresearch.com using -f Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:47:36 -0800 From: Greg Lindahl To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: debian's mips userland on mips64 Message-ID: <20030122214736.GA1094@wumpus.internal.keyresearch.com> Mail-Followup-To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org References: <20030122073006.GF6262@pureza.melbourne.sgi.com> <20030122124540.A31505@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030122124540.A31505@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 1206 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: lindahl@keyresearch.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 12:45:40PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I don't think so. You should rather implement a sys32_ptrace and > reference it in the 32bit syscall vector. Look at the version in > arch/ia64/ia32/sys_ia32.c for an example. This works as long as you aren't doing n32 - at some point we'll have a mature enough toolchain to do that, and we're going to need to hack up sys32_ptrace to do the right thing with the bigger fp register file... -- greg