All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Stanley Wang <stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PCI_Hot_Plug_Discuss <pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace pcihpfs with sysfs.
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 20:54:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030123045447.GB6584@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0301220935010.25009-100000@manticore.sh.intel.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 09:39:01AM +0800, Stanley Wang wrote:
> Hi, Grep

"Grep"?  Who's that?  :)

> Here is the patch that replace pcihpfs with sysfs. (against the lastest
> BK tree)

Thanks a lot for the patch, I appreciate.  I do have a few
comments/questions below (they are still true for your updated patch you
sent.

> diff -Nru a/drivers/hotplug/cpci_hotplug_core.c b/drivers/hotplug/cpci_hotplug_core.c
> --- a/drivers/hotplug/cpci_hotplug_core.c	Wed Jan 22 09:30:20 2003
> +++ b/drivers/hotplug/cpci_hotplug_core.c	Wed Jan 22 09:30:20 2003
> @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	memcpy(&info, hotplug_slot->info, sizeof(struct hotplug_slot_info));
>  	info.latch_status = value;
> -	return pci_hp_change_slot_info(hotplug_slot->name, &info);
> +	return 0;

We really need to keep this functionality.  Unfortunatly sysfs doesn't
support that yet.  I'd keep the call to pci_hp_change_slot_info() around
to point out that this needs to be fixed in sysfs.

>  /* Random magic number */
>  #define PCIHPFS_MAGIC 0x52454541

You can also remove this #define now, right?

> +static struct subsystem hotplug_slot_subsys;

You need to initialize this structure to something, and give it a name.
Otherwise all of the slots show up in the top of sysfs, right?  I would
really like to see these directories show up in /sys/bus/pci/slots/ if
you can get them to go there.

> -static ssize_t power_write_file (struct file *file, const char *ubuff, size_t count, loff_t *offset)
> +static ssize_t power_write_file (struct hotplug_slot *slot, const char *buf,
> +		size_t count)
>  {
> -	struct hotplug_slot *slot = file->private_data;
> -	char *buff;
> -	unsigned long lpower;
> -	u8 power;
> +	unsigned long power;
>  	int retval = 0;
>  
> -	if (*offset < 0)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -	if (count == 0 || count > 16384)
> -		return 0;
> -	if (*offset != 0)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	if (slot == NULL) {
> -		dbg("slot == NULL???\n");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -
> -	buff = kmalloc (count + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!buff)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -	memset (buff, 0x00, count + 1);
> - 
> -	if (copy_from_user ((void *)buff, (void *)ubuff, count)) {
> -		retval = -EFAULT;
> +	retval = sscanf(buf, "%ld", &power);
> +	if (retval != 1) {
> +		err("Illegla value specified for power\n");
> +		retval = -EINVAL;
>  		goto exit;
>  	}
> -	
> -	lpower = simple_strtoul (buff, NULL, 10);
> -	power = (u8)(lpower & 0xff);
> -	dbg ("power = %d\n", power);
> +	dbg ("power = %ld\n", power);
>  
>  	if (!try_module_get(slot->ops->owner)) {
>  		retval = -ENODEV;

Why change from simple_strtoul() to sscanf()?  Is this a needed change?

>  static void __exit pci_hotplug_exit (void)
>  {
> -	cpci_hotplug_exit();
> -
> -	unregister_filesystem(&pcihpfs_type);
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>  	if (slotdir)
>  		remove_proc_entry(slotdir_name, proc_bus_pci_dir);
>  #endif
> +
> +	cpci_hotplug_exit();
> +	subsystem_unregister(&hotplug_slot_subsys);
>  }
>  
>  module_init(pci_hotplug_init);

Why reorder these calls?  Also, the whole slotdir_name stuff can be
ripped out, as we will not be needing that proc directory anymore.

Again, thanks a lot for the patch, I think it's really close.

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2003-01-23  4:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-22  1:39 [PATCH] Replace pcihpfs with sysfs Stanley Wang
2003-01-23  4:54 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-01-23 10:34   ` Stanley Wang
2003-01-24  0:45     ` Greg KH
2003-01-24  2:12       ` Stanley Wang
2003-01-30  3:32       ` [Resend][PATCH] " Stanley Wang
2003-01-30  3:21   ` [PATCH] " Stanley Wang
2003-01-30  5:23     ` Greg KH
2003-01-30  5:46       ` Stanley Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030123045447.GB6584@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stanley.wang@linux.co.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.