From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 18:18:32 -0700 To: Joel Soete Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] new gcc-default for hppa Message-ID: <20030125011832.GA6228@dsl2.external.hp.com> References: <20030121235716.GA2193@dsl2.external.hp.com> <3E30242300000111@ocpmta8.freegates.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <3E30242300000111@ocpmta8.freegates.net> From: grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com (Grant Grundler) Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 12:02:25PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > Trust me, in this test the only variable is gcc release. Does it help? not alot. We need to narrow down *what* is broken and then show that to the compiler/toolchain experts. They need either a test case or shown broken asm output. > That said, always in the continuity of this idea, I also notice that ld is > used to build some kernel parts. Is it possible (even manually just for > test) to use gcc in place of ld? (if yes, howto?) hmm...offhand I don't know. grant