From: Christian Hammers <ch@westend.com>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Asym. router has problems with full ip_conntrack table in 2.4.20
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:26:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030127112653.GB9209@westend.com> (raw)
Hello
I use kernel 2.4.20 and iptables filter (no NAT or stateful filtering!) on
a router that is part of a large network and has many asymetric routes
i.e. inbound packages of some connections go over this host but replies
are send via another router. Therefore stateful packet filtering would
have no chance to get some kind of ESTABLISHED state or similar and is
completely disabled.
Now sadly the /proc/net/ip_conntrack still exists and slowly fills up,
which leads to the following message after a while of uptime:
ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
The /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max exists, too.
I can play around with it but even "-1" or "0" do not seem to disable the
table, nor to flush it.
I have reboodet the maching already.
lsmod shows only the following (relevant), ipt_conntrack.o is
at least compiled and installed in /lib/modules/* although not loaded.
ipt_MARK 800 0 (autoclean)
iptable_mangle 2208 0 (autoclean)
ipt_LOG 3200 2 (autoclean)
iptable_filter 1760 1 (autoclean)
ip_tables 13184 4 [ipt_MARK iptable_mangle ipt_LOG iptable_filter]
I currently have:
lx01:/home/ch# wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack
25963 /proc/net/ip_conntrack
(all normal traffic, 99% in state [UNREPLIED] due to asymetric routing)
I can reproduce on my desktop machine that the /proc files are active
without having ipt_conntrack.o loaded and that I really have packet loss
when the tables fill up!
TIA & bye,
-christian-
--
Christian Hammers WESTEND GmbH | Internet-Business-Provider
Technik CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
Lütticher Strasse 10 Tel 0241/701333-11
ch@westend.com D-52064 Aachen Fax 0241/911879
next reply other threads:[~2003-01-27 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-27 11:26 Christian Hammers [this message]
2003-01-27 11:40 ` Asym. router has problems with full ip_conntrack table in 2.4.20 Martin Josefsson
2003-01-27 12:24 ` Patrick Schaaf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030127112653.GB9209@westend.com \
--to=ch@westend.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.