From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois-Rene Rideau Subject: Re: mkreiserfs -s 1024 makes unmountable partitions Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 12:42:50 +0100 Sender: Francois-Rene Rideau Message-ID: <20030127114250.GB10556@hell.mine.nu> References: <20030118080941.B5575@humilis> <20030118115724.GA946@Kadath> <20030121213336.GA6756@hell.mine.nu> <20030122065712.D5575@humilis> <20030122100342.GA14100@hell.mine.nu> <20030124222823.GA15643@hell.mine.nu> <20030126181816.GA1274@Kadath> <20030127095957.A22720@namesys.com> <20030127112651.GA10556@hell.mine.nu> <20030127143305.A26767@namesys.com> Reply-To: Francois-Rene Rideau Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030127143305.A26767@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 02:33:05PM +0300, Oleg Drokin wrote: > But given the trend that lots of users are using distro kernels only, > and e.g. SuSE ships these patches for some time already, such a warning > will cause lots of confusion. Hum. Then maybe SuSE could also patch back the mkreiserfs to not produce a warning? And/or you could and a note in the man page that would explain things better than a warning could -- the man page is the first thing one reads in case of trouble. Anyway. > So far we have not found any good way to print warning only > when it is really needed. > Always printing the warning is not very good idea in my opinion. I understand that. Cheers! [ Fran=E7ois-Ren=E9 =D0VB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tu= nes.org ] [ TUNES project for a Free Reflective Computing System | http://tunes.org= ] If Java had true garbage collection, most programs would delete themselves upon execution. -- Robert Sewell