From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: benoit-lists@fb12.de, dada1@cosmosbay.com, cgf@redhat.com,
andersg@0x63.nu, lkernel2003@tuxers.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tobi@tobi.nu
Subject: Re: [TEST FIX] Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 10:35:34 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030128.103534.115458142.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200301281409.RAA28740@sex.inr.ac.ru>
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:09:09 +0300 (MSK)
We apparently have segment of zero length in queue. :-)
Well, that chunk cannot be responsible for this directly, I am afraid
we somewhat arrived to attempt to retransmit already acked segment.
Hmmm, it is one of few places where sequence numbers of already
sent packet are mangled. :-)
Good set of debug checks would be the following:
--- net/ipv4/tcp_output.c.~1~ Mon Jan 27 14:46:33 2003
+++ net/ipv4/tcp_output.c Tue Jan 28 10:47:08 2003
@@ -441,6 +441,9 @@
TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq;
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq;
+ BUG_TRAP(TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->end_seq);
+ BUG_TRAP(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq);
+
/* PSH and FIN should only be set in the second packet. */
flags = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags;
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = flags & ~(TCPCB_FLAG_FIN|TCPCB_FLAG_PSH);
@@ -524,6 +527,7 @@
}
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq += len;
+ BUG_TRAP(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq);
skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_HW;
return 0;
}
@@ -796,6 +800,7 @@
/* Update sequence range on original skb. */
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->end_seq;
+ BUG_TRAP(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq);
/* Merge over control information. */
flags |= TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->flags; /* This moves PSH/FIN etc. over */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-28 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-24 18:43 SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX David C Niemi
2003-01-24 20:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-24 20:46 ` lost
2003-01-24 21:15 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-25 2:00 ` SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 (TCP_NODELAY?) Christopher Faylor
2003-01-27 14:27 ` SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX David C Niemi
2003-01-27 18:06 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-27 18:11 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-27 18:28 ` Anders Gustafsson
2003-01-27 22:36 ` [TEST FIX] " David S. Miller
2003-01-28 2:25 ` lost
2003-01-28 2:57 ` [TEST FIX] Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, kuznet
2003-01-28 3:22 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-28 3:39 ` [TEST FIX] Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX Christopher Faylor
2003-01-28 3:55 ` kuznet
2003-01-28 7:08 ` dada1
2003-01-28 12:36 ` Sebastian Benoit
2003-01-28 14:09 ` kuznet
2003-01-28 18:35 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-01-28 19:16 ` Sebastian Benoit
2003-01-28 20:34 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-28 21:59 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-28 22:12 ` Sebastian Benoit
2003-01-28 23:21 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 0:02 ` [TEST FIX] Re: SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, kuznet
2003-01-29 0:09 ` kuznet
2003-01-29 0:46 ` Sebastian Benoit
2003-01-29 4:12 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 6:52 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-28 23:56 ` kuznet
2003-01-29 0:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 3:14 ` kuznet
2003-01-29 7:32 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-29 14:12 ` David C Niemi
2003-01-29 14:24 ` kuznet
2003-01-29 15:11 ` dada1
2003-02-02 15:40 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-01-27 21:27 ` SSH Hangs in 2.5.59 and 2.5.55 but not 2.4.x, through Cisco PIX Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030128.103534.115458142.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=andersg@0x63.nu \
--cc=benoit-lists@fb12.de \
--cc=cgf@redhat.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkernel2003@tuxers.net \
--cc=tobi@tobi.nu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.