From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick Caulfield <caulfield@sistina.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [linux-lvm] Installing LVM on s/390 redhat 7.2 2.4.7-39
Message-ID: <20030128111907.GA880@tykepenguin.com>
References: <20030128110811.OREX14589.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.137.100.62]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030128110811.OREX14589.mta02-svc.ntlworld.com@[10.137.100.62]>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Tue Jan 28 05:20:01 2003
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:08:11AM +0000, jrelist@ntlworld.com wrote:
> 
> Peter
> 
> Still get the problem with kernel 2.4.9-38. I took your advice and checked out the System.map and got this:
> 
> 000315e8 T lock_kiovec               
> 00031800 T unlock_kiovec             
> 00050940 T brw_kiovec                
> 00068688 T alloc_kiovec_sz           
> 0006873c T free_kiovec_sz            
> 001ca412 ? __kstrtab_alloc_kiovec_sz 
> 001ca430 ? __kstrtab_free_kiovec_sz  
> 001ca4a4 ? __kstrtab_lock_kiovec     
> 001ca4be ? __kstrtab_unlock_kiovec   
> 001ca4da ? __kstrtab_brw_kiovec      
> 001d1d68 ? __ksymtab_alloc_kiovec_sz 
> 001d1d70 ? __ksymtab_free_kiovec_sz  
> 001d1d90 ? __ksymtab_lock_kiovec     
> 001d1d98 ? __ksymtab_unlock_kiovec   
> 001d1da0 ? __ksymtab_brw_kiovec      
> 
> Strikes me that it could be something (hopefully) as simple as amending labels in the appropriate lvm code - just got to suss out what needs changing now.
> 
> Thanks for the advice so far
> 
> John

This is quite an old problem (but then 2.4.9 is an old kernel I suppose!)

See:

http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0111.1/0815.html

patrick