From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= <reiserfs@ragnark.vestdata.no>
Subject: Re: reiserfs on redhat advanced server?
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 23:41:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20030130234142.E8448@vestdata.no>
References: <20030130173522.3aa4d0e1.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> <3E397A19.60409@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-12564-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3E397A19.60409@namesys.com>; from reiser@namesys.com on Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:16:41PM +0300
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Jure Pecar <pegasus@nerv.eu.org>, reiserfs-list@namesys.com

On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 10:16:41PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote:
> >does anyone have some expirience with the reiserfs provided in redhat's
> >2.4.9-e.3 kernel from its Advanced Server?
>
> Linux 2.4.x did not become stable until 2.4.18.  I strongly advise not=20
> to use anything before 2.4.18 for a machine you care about.
>=20
> Well tested is not a substitute for stable.;-)

I don't know this kernel in particular, but in general RH's kernels are
heavily patched, and 2.4.9-e.3 may actually be closer to 2.4.18 than
2.4.9 from Linus.



--=20
Ragnar Kj=F8rstad