From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: reiserfs on redhat advanced server? Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 15:40:18 +0300 Message-ID: <20030131154018.B11947@namesys.com> References: <20030130173522.3aa4d0e1.pegasus@nerv.eu.org> <3E397A19.60409@namesys.com> <20030130234142.E8448@vestdata.no> <3E3A6071.6060102@namesys.com> <20030131115333.GC15359@marowsky-bree.de> <3E3A67AE.4050601@namesys.com> <20030131122147.GE15359@marowsky-bree.de> <3E3A6D76.7080300@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3A6D76.7080300@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Lars Marowsky-Bree , Ragnar Kj?rstad , Jure Pecar , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 03:35:02PM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > I understand and support being pissed at Linus for calling it 2.4.0 when > it wasn't stable enough before 2.4.18 because VM and VFS were still > being changed, but Marcelo is pretty stable in all of his official > releases, and it is easy to get him to take good code. Unfortunatelly vanilla 2.4.20 is pretty bad shaped. (and pretty bad mouthed for that, too). Bye, Oleg