All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <conman@kolivas.net>
To: linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59-mm7 with contest
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:30:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302010930.54538.conman@kolivas.net> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.net) benchmarks using the osdl 
(http://www.osdl.org) hardware comparing mm7

no_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       79      94.9    0       0.0     1.00
2.5.59-mm6      1       78      96.2    0       0.0     1.00
2.5.59-mm7      5       78      96.2    0       0.0     1.00
cacherun:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       76      98.7    0       0.0     0.96
2.5.59-mm6      1       76      97.4    0       0.0     0.97
2.5.59-mm7      5       75      98.7    0       0.0     0.96
process_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       92      81.5    28      16.3    1.16
2.5.59-mm6      1       92      81.5    25      15.2    1.18
2.5.59-mm7      4       90      82.2    25      18.3    1.15
ctar_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       98      80.6    2       5.1     1.24
2.5.59-mm6      3       112     70.5    2       4.5     1.44
2.5.59-mm7      5       96      80.2    1       3.4     1.23
xtar_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       101     75.2    1       4.0     1.28
2.5.59-mm6      3       115     66.1    1       4.3     1.47
2.5.59-mm7      5       96      79.2    0       3.3     1.23
io_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       153     50.3    8       13.7    1.94
2.5.59-mm6      2       90      83.3    2       6.7     1.15
2.5.59-mm7      5       110     68.2    2       6.4     1.41
read_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       102     76.5    5       4.9     1.29
2.5.59-mm6      3       733     10.8    56      6.3     9.40
2.5.59-mm7      4       90      84.4    1       1.3     1.15
list_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       95      80.0    0       6.3     1.20
2.5.59-mm6      3       97      79.4    0       6.2     1.24
2.5.59-mm7      4       94      80.9    0       6.4     1.21
mem_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       97      80.4    56      2.1     1.23
2.5.59-mm6      3       94      83.0    50      2.1     1.21
2.5.59-mm7      4       92      82.6    45      1.4     1.18
dbench_load:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       126     60.3    3       22.2    1.59
2.5.59-mm6      3       122     61.5    3       25.4    1.56
2.5.59-mm7      4       121     62.0    2       24.8    1.55
io_other:
Kernel     [runs]       Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
2.5.59          3       89      84.3    2       5.5     1.13
2.5.59-mm6      2       90      83.3    2       6.7     1.15
2.5.59-mm7      3       90      83.3    2       5.6     1.15

Seems the fix for "reads starves everything" works. Affected the tar loads 
too? 

Con
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+OvkcF6dfvkL3i1gRAihPAJ0dYEHFrIf6Ut1j1Kp62JGRkq076QCffpgE
ztv0SsBWixlwn++QQ0XBuyg=
=PSRo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

             reply	other threads:[~2003-01-31 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-01-31 22:30 Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-01-31 23:01 ` [BENCHMARK] 2.5.59-mm7 with contest Andrew Morton
2003-01-31 23:13   ` Con Kolivas
2003-02-01  2:04     ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-01  0:37 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-01  0:44   ` Con Kolivas
     [not found]     ` <3E3B1B1E.7050800@cyberone.com.au>
2003-02-01  1:09       ` Con Kolivas
2003-02-01  1:23         ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-01  3:21           ` Con Kolivas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200302010930.54538.conman@kolivas.net \
    --to=conman@kolivas.net \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.