All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: alan@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rossb@google.com
Subject: Re: 2.4.21-pre4: PDC ide driver problems with shared interrupts
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:58:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030205185825.6039eecc.skraw@ithnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1044467091.685.155.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr>

On 05 Feb 2003 18:44:51 +0100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 18:38, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> > On 05 Feb 2003 18:34:55 +0100
> > Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 18:19, Ross Biro wrote:
> > > > Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > >While I agree with you here, I don't think it's what's happening.
> > > > >	/* clear INTR & ERROR flags */
> > > > >	hwif->OUTB(dma_stat|6, hwif->dma_status);
> > > > >
> > > > >  
> > > > >
> > > > You have way to much faith in the hardware.  Promise is especially
> > > > known for not keeping to the spec.  I wouldn't trust the interrupt bit
> > > > to be valid unless a dma is actually active, i.e. that
> > > > 
> > > >                   hwif->OUTB(hwif->INB(dma_base)|1, dma_base);
> > > > 
> > > > has actually been written.  
> > > > 
> > > > I've actually had a manufacturer tell me that they don't worry about
> > > > the spec, just making things work with Windows.
> > > 
> > > Ok, so that gives us 2 possibilities. The above problem, which would be
> > > fixed by locking all around ide_dma_read/write (or rather in the
> > > _caller_, seems better so we don't have to drop the lock for ATAPI).
> > > 
> > > And a possible wraparound of waiting_for_dma if 255 IRQs come in from
> > > whatever device we share the IRQ line with.
> > > 
> > > I beleive both need fixing...
> > > 
> > > Ben.
> > 
> > Ok, yet another small brick in the wall: this mb has 64bit/66MHz PCI slots.
> > PDC is only 32bit/33MHz PCI. So it may well be that others are in fact
> > _able_ to produce a damn lot more data/interrupts than the PDC. I am pretty
> > astonished by the number of interrupts created by the 3com tg3 cards
> > anyways...
> 
> Ok, then please try my "fix" to remove the increment of waiting_for_dma
> and let us know if it helps.

I will try, in the meantime can any kind soul please give me a hint why I
cannot see the interrupts distributed among the CPUs when enabling smp and
apic on this very same box:

           CPU0       CPU1       
  0:      71158          0    IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:        941          0    IO-APIC-edge  keyboard
  2:          0          0          XT-PIC  cascade
 12:      33166          0    IO-APIC-edge  PS/2 Mouse
 15:          4          0    IO-APIC-edge  ide1
 17:       1732          0   IO-APIC-level  ide2, ide3
 18:       3423          0   IO-APIC-level  eth0, eth1
 21:       8177          0   IO-APIC-level  eth2
 22:     112943          0   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 23:         16          0   IO-APIC-level  aic7xxx
 25:         74          0   IO-APIC-level  HiSax
 26:          0          0   IO-APIC-level  EMU10K1
NMI:          0          0 
LOC:      71085      71059 
ERR:          0
MIS:          0

??
(kernel 2.4.21-pre4)
-- 
Regards,
Stephan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-02-05 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-02 15:18 2.4.21-pre4: tg3 driver problems with shared interrupts Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-02 16:49 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-02 17:09   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-02 17:15     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-02 17:52   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-02 18:28     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-02-02 18:31       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-03 10:25       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-05  9:48       ` 2.4.21-pre4: PDC ide " Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-05 11:16         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-02-05 11:39           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-05 12:21             ` Alan Cox
2003-02-05 12:22             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-02-05 12:50               ` Alan Cox
2003-02-05 13:19               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-05 12:24           ` Alan Cox
2003-02-05 16:56           ` Ross Biro
2003-02-05 17:12             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-02-05 17:19               ` Ross Biro
2003-02-05 17:34                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-02-05 17:38                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
     [not found]                     ` <1044467091.685.155.camel@zion.wanadoo.fr>
2003-02-05 17:58                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski [this message]
2003-02-05 20:00                     ` Bryan Andersen
2003-02-05 19:10                 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-06 12:20               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-06 23:04                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-02-07  9:10                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-05 16:44 Robbert Kouprie
2003-02-05 19:45 ` Bryan Andersen
     [not found] <7b263321.0302140626.2ddb7980@posting.google.com>
2003-02-14 14:41 ` Edward King
2003-02-14 15:41   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] <20030202153009$2e0d@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <20030205181006$107c@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <20030205181006$7bb8@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <20030205181006$455c@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <20030205181006$5dba@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <20030205181006$3358@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <200302061451.h16Epl0Z001134@pc.skynet.be>
2003-02-23 14:33             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-02-23 15:04               ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-02-23 17:29                 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
     [not found] <3F1C54A8.5020404@snarkhunter.com>
2003-07-22 14:44 ` Edward King
2003-07-22 18:07   ` John V. Martinez
2003-07-22 21:02     ` Edward King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030205185825.6039eecc.skraw@ithnet.com \
    --to=skraw@ithnet.com \
    --cc=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rossb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.