From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Corrupted/unreadable journal: reiser vs. ext3 Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:25:06 +0300 Message-ID: <20030212102506.B10274@namesys.com> References: <20030211144144.A5A9.MIKE@mystica.cx> <20030211171139.A5B3.MIKE@mystica.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030211171139.A5B3.MIKE@mystica.cx> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mike Hodson Cc: Adam Goryachev , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:02:21PM -0600, Mike Hodson wrote: > > Finally, I find it interesting to see people who swear they will never use > > reiserfs again to be on the reiserfs mailing list :). > I may use it at some point, when its as well proven as the second > extended filesystem is currently. Its interesting to see how many people > have errors, and when that number gets lower and more people start > posting good things I may reevaluate it at some point :) I guess you are not subscribed to ext3-users mailinglist? The thing is that all the fs lists are filled with error reports (if fs is used by someone of course). When user have zero problems, he is just busy doing his own things usually. Users seem to only write letters to FS mailing lists when they have problems. (of course there are some exclusions, but general tendency is like this). Bye, Oleg