From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnt Karlsen Subject: Re: applying a rule Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 22:45:01 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20030212224501.2e48967f.arnt@c2i.net> References: <000001c2d2d1$48f886c0$bb00a8c0@DOUG1> <003201c2d2d3$82c6bc30$3864a8c0@discmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <003201c2d2d3$82c6bc30$3864a8c0@discmail.com> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: "Aldo S. Lagana" Cc: doug@aircomwireless.net, netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:15:39 -0500, "Aldo S. Lagana" top posted in message <003201c2d2d3$82c6bc30$3864a8c0@discmail.com>: > From: Doug Yeager > Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 3:00 PM > > > > > I have ppp0 (external interface) > > > > I also have ppp1 through ppp200 (vpn connections) > > > > How can I apply a rule to all the vpn connections but omit ppp0 > > ..for i in `seq 1 1 200` ; do $write-rule-for ppp$i ; done # ;-) > > Is it some combination of ppp+ and ! ppp0 > > > > Or is it two separate rules. And which rule would go first if they > > are separate? > > > > Thx, > > doug > > silly question - Can you rename your ppp0 interface to something else? > That is what I did for a similar problem. ..word has it there are only silly _answers_. Show him how _you_ did it. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.