From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Corrupted/unreadable journal: reiser vs. ext3 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:59:02 +0300 Message-ID: <20030214135902.I10351@namesys.com> References: <3E4AA902.86F15815@interface-ag.com> <3E4C392A.2070909@namesys.com> <20030214111829.A21849@namesys.com> <20030214031316.L22930@schatzie.adilger.int> <20030214131746.H10351@namesys.com> <20030214035034.M22930@schatzie.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030214035034.M22930@schatzie.adilger.int> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Zygo Blaxell , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 03:50:34AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > like ext3 "errors={panic,remount-ro,warning}"? If you marked the filesystem > > > and/or journal in error and mount read-only, and force a full fsck at > > > reboot time at least the user has a chance - otherwise the node might > > > just panic in a loop. > > It hangs on panic ;) (because it does BUG() ), so no cyclical reboot. > Ah, you said panic, but panic != BUG... There is a "reboot-on-panic" flag Yes, I know. I just used the wrong word. Tere is reiserfs_panic, but it does BUG(), hence the confusion. (btw panic() in 2.5 seems not to halt the machine. I was able to continue work on 2.5 after panic() was called. Though that was during 2.5.20-something I think, so may be it is back to normal behaviour). > that is often set on servers so they don't sit stupidly when they could > reboot and start working again. Yeah, I use that on my servers too. Bye, Oleg