From: Ed Tomlinson <tomlins@cam.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:38:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302141638.44843.tomlins@cam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3DF54BD7.726993D@digeo.com>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> The version posted the other day did fair queueing of requests between
> processes, but it did not help to provide fair request allocation. This
> version does that too, results are rather remarkable. In addition, the
> following changes were made:
The numbers from the second message are nice - especially considering this
is only the second iteration...
A question about io priorities. I wonder if they could not be implemented
via a per pid cfq_quantum? If I am not missunderstanding things, a bigger
value here for a given process should mean that it gets a larger share of
the io bandwidth...
Comments?
Ed Tomlinson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-14 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-09 8:26 2.5.50-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-12-09 8:26 ` 2.5.50-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-12-13 22:55 ` 2.5.50-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-13 22:55 ` 2.5.50-mm2 Christoph Hellwig
2002-12-13 19:58 ` 2.5.50-mm2 Andrew Morton
2002-12-13 19:58 ` 2.5.50-mm2 Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <200212092059.06287.tomlins@cam.org>
[not found] ` <3DF54BD7.726993D@digeo.com>
2003-02-05 4:41 ` [PATCH] let kernel find QT in latest debian sid Ed Tomlinson
2003-02-11 13:13 ` [BUG] link error in usbserial with gcc3.2 Ed Tomlinson
2003-02-12 1:59 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-02-18 5:51 ` Greg KH
2003-02-18 12:50 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-02-13 13:18 ` [PATCH] (0-2) governors for 60-bk Ed Tomlinson
2003-02-14 21:38 ` Ed Tomlinson [this message]
2003-02-15 8:33 ` [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2 Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-14 14:19 Jens Axboe
2003-02-14 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-15 10:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-02-15 11:22 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-15 16:35 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-16 6:24 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50L.0302150920510.16301-100000@imladris.surriel .com>
2003-02-15 11:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-02-15 11:49 ` Rik van Riel
2003-02-15 12:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.50L.0302150947570.20371-100000@imladris.surriel .com>
2003-02-15 12:07 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-02-15 16:00 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200302141638.44843.tomlins@cam.org \
--to=tomlins@cam.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.