All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.61-mm1 +/- as or cfq with contest
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:53:36 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302162053.36119.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030216095149.GA6521@suse.de>

On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 08:51 pm, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 16 2003, Con Kolivas wrote:
> > Here are contest (http://contest.kolivas.org) results with osdl
> > (http://www.osdl.org) hardware for 2.5.61-mm1 with either the as i/o
> > scheduler or the cfq scheduler.
> >
> > io_load:
> > Kernel         [runs]   Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
> > 2.5.60-mm1          3   112     67.0    15.7    7.1     1.42
> > 2.5.61              2   143     52.4    32.9    13.3    1.81
> > 2.5.61-mm1          2   634     12.5    257.3   24.6    7.83
> > 2.5.61-mm1cfq       3   397     19.6    123.3   18.1    5.03
>
> These loo fishy, could be some other interaction. I'm consistently
> beating 2.5.60-mm1/2.5.61 on io_load here, but that is 2.5.61 base and
> not 2.5.61-mm1 base. Could be something odd happening there.

I dont think they're fishy - taken in the mm1 context -. I have tested cfq3a 
without mm1 and it does beat the baseline. See a previous email I posted with 
it.

Con

  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-16  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-16  9:46 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.61-mm1 +/- as or cfq with contest Con Kolivas
2003-02-16  9:51 ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-16  9:53   ` Con Kolivas [this message]
2003-02-16  9:59     ` Jens Axboe
2003-02-16 10:43       ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-16 10:45         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200302162053.36119.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.