From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ookhoi Subject: Re: no reiserfs quota in 2.4 yet? 2.4.21-pre4-ac4 says different Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:12:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20030217191254.P1284@humilis> References: <20030217183957.O1284@humilis> <1045504527.2182.415.camel@tiny.suse.com> Reply-To: ookhoi@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1045504527.2182.415.camel@tiny.suse.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chris Mason Cc: ookhoi@humilis.net, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Chris Mason wrote (ao): > On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 12:39, Ookhoi wrote: > > Today I put a new kernel on a server which has reiserfs and needs > > quota. I searched for the quota patches (found them in the mail > > archive) and saw that they are very old: > > > > ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/testing/quota-2.4.20 > > > > 3 december 2002. They don't apply to a current kernel. > > Well, 2.4.20 is the current kernel ;-) Which kernel do you want them > against? I've got patches against 2.4.21-preX in testing here, but not > against -ac. They should merge against -ac now more easily, but I > haven't had time to really test it. > > Do you want to try the merge on -ac or would you rather try against > 2.4.21-preX Thanks a lot for your quick answer! Yes, you are of course right that 2.4.20 is the current kernel. My mistake. I would love to use -ac, so patches against that would be great. But you would make me very happy with patches against -pre too. Is there any chance that you consider your against-ac patches ready for inclusion in Alan's kernel patches?