From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ookhoi Subject: Re: reiser4 and 2.5.60 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:52:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20030218105247.D20771@humilis> References: <20030215160033.A3570@humilis> <20030218121257.A27125@namesys.com> <20030218103151.B19634@humilis> <20030218124236.A31148@namesys.com> Reply-To: ookhoi@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030218124236.A31148@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Oleg Drokin Cc: Ookhoi , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Oleg Drokin wrote (ao): > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:31:51AM +0100, Ookhoi wrote: > > Sure. It is a P-MMX, 200MHz, with 512MB ram, and a 4GB scsi disk. > > Hm. That must be real slow, is it? (just because not all of the RAM is > covered by L2 cache, I mean. Or do you have some sensible chipset in > there?). It is slow, but I am not aware of issues with too little L2 cache. A quick look at dmesg didn't give me more clue. Can you please explain a bit, or give some google keywords? It is only 200MHz, so I expect it to be slow, but if I can make it faster that would be nice (without removing the ram if possible ;-) > > As said before, I do reiser4 on a loop fs. I did the same with > > reiser3, and that worked ok. Could the loop fs be a problem for > > reiser4? > > Well, it should not, but if you can test it not on loop device just to > be sure, that would be nice. I see if I can free a partition, or put an extra disk in. > > Do you need more info, or want me to test things? > > I need to experiment a bit more locallywith info I got from you, I > think. > > > It seems that reiser4 in BK is not updated for a few days now. > > Because it is already perfect, nothing to improve ;) Goody :-) Well, let me know if you want me to test something. I'll let you know what happens with reiser4 on a partition.