From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:22:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:22:31 -0500 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:15633 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:22:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:32:31 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Arador , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: buggy include path? Message-ID: <20030219153231.GA970@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Randy.Dunlap" , Arador , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030219002938.08b717c7.diegocg@teleline.es> <20030218153919.16d41430.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030218153919.16d41430.rddunlap@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 03:39:19PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Can the -Idirname be made more complete, e.g. by using > $TOPDIR or $MODLIB ... me wonders. > Or would that just be duplicating the default behavior? > Anyone? That would make moving a kernel tree requiring a recompile due to usage of absolute paths. Sam