From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: rsync and memory leak on linux 2.2? Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:19:23 +0300 Message-ID: <20030220091923.A20036@namesys.com> References: <1045156304.11405.149.camel@barnes> <87r8abtlhq.fsf@freeze.oslo.dnmi.no> <20030214130111.A27034@namesys.com> <1045689849.1168.24.camel@barnes> <3E5402B0.5030606@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5402B0.5030606@namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hans Reiser Cc: Patrick O'Rourke , Adrian Phillips , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello! On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:18:24AM +0300, Hans Reiser wrote: > Thanks Patrick. This leaves us with one unsolved reiserfs V3 bug that I > know of (unlink related one, vs is working on it, and he is not Vladimir tracked that down yesterday. At least we think so. (and even if the fix we discussed yesterday won't help, that'd mean we have another bug in addition to what Vladimir found. And this is indeed a race between two iget(). I am not sure if VFS is flawed, but I think at least partially it is. Because in 2.5 that piece of code redesigned right way.) > completely sure it is reiserfs not vfs....). Oleg, am I right in > thinking that the samba+reiserfs bug looks like a samba bug? That turned out to be fs corruption of unknown source. Hardware is the main suspect for now. Bye, Oleg