From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: no reiserfs quota in 2.4 yet? 2.4.21-pre4-ac4 says different Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:44:15 +0300 Message-ID: <20030220144415.A12418@namesys.com> References: <20030217183957.O1284@humilis> <1045504527.2182.415.camel@tiny.suse.com> <20030219134842.GB7138@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20030219234024.N20771@humilis> <1045703410.16042.70.camel@tiny.suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1045703410.16042.70.camel@tiny.suse.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Chris Mason Cc: ookhoi@humilis.net, Jan Kara , reiserfs-list@namesys.com, reiser@namesys.com Hello! On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:10:11PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: > > > Alan has needed changes to generic quota code already in his patchset > > > so probably just leaving out these changes should make everything work > > > (but I haven't tested it recently). > > You mean, I should use only a few of these? > > 01-quota-v2-2.4.20.diff > Not this, -ac already has it > > o quota in -ac patches for reiser (like the Configure help already > > says ;-) > I doubt I'll send it to Alan, keeping up with vanilla and the suse > kernels is hard enough ;-) If someone wants to actively work with me on > maintaining them in the ac tree, drop me a private message and we should > be able to work something out. I think if Hans would agree to that idea, I can do this. After all - we are interested to have working reiserfs quota support in RedHat's default kernels. And those are largely based on -ac patches. Hans? Bye, Oleg