From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cort Dougan Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:43:18 -0700 To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: Paul Mackerras , Eugene Surovegin , brian.auld@adic.com, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: PowerMac vs. Intel for PowerPC Development Host Message-ID: <20030220194318.GC9782@host109.fsmlabs.com> References: <20030220010112.GB22880@f00f.org> <995FF289C9D69747A09E42992644595405B23678@penguin.adic.com> <20030220010112.GB22880@f00f.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20030219210505.037b67e8@mail.ebshome.net> <995FF289C9D69747A09E42992644595405B23678@penguin.adic.com> <20030220010112.GB22880@f00f.org> <15956.11756.925757.532452@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20030220054534.GA24107@f00f.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20030220054534.GA24107@f00f.org> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Ah, if that's the case, another data point. The 2.8 GHz dual P4, with hyperthreading on (very important) and make -j 8 gives me a 1m 45s _devel tree build for the ebony. If the cache is warm it's faster but that's with a cold buffer cache. } I wasn't trying to compare fairly, mostly get the lowest possible } compile time. } } } On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 09:10:48PM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote: } } > I tried to compile the _same_ PPC kernel for one of boards (440GP } > based). } } > Cross compiling on PIII 755Mhz running SuSE - 16 min } > Cross compiling on G4 PowerBook 1Ghz running YDL - 6 min } } I don't have a PPC host to reasonably compare with, but a 440GP kernel } (linuxppc_2_4_devel) for me builds in 3 minutes 29s (with gcc-2.95). } } } } --cw } ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/