All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob Johnson <livewire@gentoo.org>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] TIObench 2.5.60 performance
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:05:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200302210805.39508.livewire@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94F20261551DC141B6B559DC4910867217CCBE@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com>

My Tiobenchs on raid0 are quite a bit slower with 2.5.62 then 2.4.20 vanilla  
:(
average 50m/sec on 2.4
average 28m/sec on 2.5.62 
hdparm shows similiar results.

On Friday 21 February 2003 05:43 am, Aniruddha M Marathe wrote:
> Here is TIObench performance of 2.5.62. Comparison of 2.5.62 and 2.5.60 is
> given below.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>-------------------------------------- test					2.5.62 (as compared to
> 					2.5.60) APPROXIMATE % change
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------------------------------- rate (megabytes per second)		less than
> 5% increase
> CPU % utilization			less than 5% increase
> Average Latency			5 % decrease
> Maximum latency			5-10 % increase
> CPU efficiency				less than 5% increase
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>--------------------------------------
>
>
> ************************************************************
> 		TIObench for kernel 2.5.62
> ************************************************************
> No size specified, using 252 MB
>
> Unit information
> ================
> File size = megabytes
> Blk Size  = bytes
> Rate      = megabytes per second
> CPU%      = percentage of CPU used during the test
> Latency   = milliseconds
> Lat%      = percent of requests that took longer than X seconds
> CPU Eff   = Rate divided by CPU% - throughput per cpu load
>
> Sequential Reads
>                               File  Blk   Num                   Avg     
> Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU Identifier                    Size  Size 
> Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
> ---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ ---------
> -----------  -------- -------- ----- 2.5.62                        252  
> 4096   10    7.93 4.271%    12.438     2841.36   0.00000  0.00000   186
>
> Random Reads
>                               File  Blk   Num                   Avg     
> Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU Identifier                    Size  Size 
> Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
> ---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ ---------
> -----------  -------- -------- ----- 2.5.62                        252  
> 4096   10    0.47 0.552%   213.629     1301.68   0.00000  0.00000    84
>
> Sequential Writes
>                               File  Blk   Num                   Avg     
> Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU Identifier                    Size  Size 
> Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
> ---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ ---------
> -----------  -------- -------- ----- 2.5.62                        252  
> 4096   10   12.39 21.14%     6.214    37150.05   0.10157  0.00782    59
>
> Random Writes
>                               File  Blk   Num                   Avg     
> Maximum      Lat%     Lat%    CPU Identifier                    Size  Size 
> Thr   Rate  (CPU%)  Latency    Latency      >2s      >10s    Eff
> ---------------------------- ------ ----- ---  ------ ------ ---------
> -----------  -------- -------- ----- 2.5.62                        252  
> 4096   10    0.73 0.891%     0.762     1761.34   0.00000  0.00000    81 No
> size specified, using 252 MB
>
> Aniruddha Marathe
> WIPRO Technologies, India.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-21 12:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-21 10:43 [BENCHMARK] TIObench 2.5.60 performance Aniruddha M Marathe
2003-02-21 13:05 ` Bob Johnson [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-13  9:41 Aniruddha M Marathe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200302210805.39508.livewire@gentoo.org \
    --to=livewire@gentoo.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.