From: Willem Riede <wrlk@riede.org>
To: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:20:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E58BBC3.7020507@domdv.de>; from ast@domdv.de on Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 07:17:07 -0500
On 2003.02.23 07:17 Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> if( the_result != 0
> && ((driver_byte(the_result) & DRIVER_SENSE) != 0)
> ===> && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[2] == UNIT_ATTENTION
> && SRpnt->sr_sense_buffer[12] == 0x3A ) {
> rscsi_disks[i].capacity = 0x1fffff;
> sector_size = 512;
> rscsi_disks[i].device->changed = 1;
> rscsi_disks[i].ready = 0;
> ...
>
> Now look at the marked (===>) lines above. I dont believe the test for
> UNIT_ATTENTION is correct. As far as I could find out the sense
> information from TEST_UNIT_READY should be either NO_SENSE,
> ILLEGAL_REQUEST or NOT_READY. As there is a check for 'medium not
> present' (0x3A) the test should be for NOT_READY instead of
> UNIT_ATTENTION. ger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
You are right about this one. It should be NOT_READY, value 0x02.
As a matter of fact, ASQ 0x3A is unique, so you could just delete the
test of sr_sense_buffer[2] and it would work as expected.
Success, Willem Riede.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-23 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-23 12:17 2.4.20: possibly wrong handling of removeable scsi disks Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 13:20 ` Willem Riede [this message]
2003-02-23 13:41 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2003-02-23 16:14 ` Scott Merritt
2003-02-24 23:10 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-02-24 23:46 ` Scott Merritt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030223132009.GA2155@linnie.riede.org \
--to=wrlk@riede.org \
--cc=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.