Re: [PATCH] s390 (7/13): gcc 3.3 adaptions.

[Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:35:24PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com> writes:
> 
> |> Does gcc still warn about things like
> |> 
> |> 	#define COUNT (sizeof(array)/sizeof(element))
> |> 
> |> 	int i;
> |> 	for (i = 0; i < COUNT; i++)
> |> 		...
> |> 
> |> where COUNT is obviously unsigned (because sizeof is size_t and thus 
> |> unsigned)?
> |> 
> |> Gcc used to complain about things like that, which is a FUCKING DISASTER. 
> 
> How can you distinguish that from other occurrences of (int)<(size_t)?

Value range propagation pass, then warn?

	Jakub