From: rwhron@earthlink.net
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: IO scheduler benchmarking
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:57:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030225215755.GA2038@rushmore> (raw)
> Why does 2.5.62-mm2 have higher sequential
> write latency than 2.5.61-mm1?
Anticipatory scheduler tiobench profile on uniprocessor:
2.5.61-mm1 2.5.62-mm2
total 1993387 1933241
default_idle 1873179 1826650
system_call 49838 43036
get_offset_tsc 21905 20883
do_schedule 13893 10344
do_gettimeofday 8478 6044
sys_gettimeofday 8077 5153
current_kernel_time 4904 12165
syscall_exit 4047 1243
__wake_up 1274 1000
io_schedule 1166 1039
prepare_to_wait 1093 792
schedule_timeout 612 366
delay_tsc 502 443
get_fpu_cwd 473 376
syscall_call 389 378
math_state_restore 354 271
restore_fpu 329 287
del_timer 325 200
device_not_available 290 377
finish_wait 257 181
add_timer 218 137
io_schedule_timeout 195 72
cpu_idle 193 218
run_timer_softirq 137 33
remove_wait_queue 121 188
eligible_child 106 154
sys_wait4 105 162
work_resched 104 110
ret_from_intr 97 74
dup_task_struct 75 48
add_wait_queue 67 124
__cond_resched 59 69
do_page_fault 55 0
do_softirq 53 12
pte_alloc_one 51 67
release_task 44 55
get_signal_to_deliver 38 43
get_wchan 16 10
mod_timer 15 0
old_mmap 14 19
prepare_to_wait_exclusive 10 32
mm_release 7 0
release_x86_irqs 7 8
sys_getppid 6 5
handle_IRQ_event 4 0
schedule_tail 4 0
kill_proc_info 3 0
device_not_available_emulate 2 0
task_prio 1 1
__down 0 33
__down_failed_interruptible 0 3
init_fpu 0 12
pgd_ctor 0 3
process_timeout 0 2
restore_all 0 2
sys_exit 0 2
--
Randy Hron
http://home.earthlink.net/~rwhron/kernel/bigbox.html
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-25 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-25 21:57 rwhron [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-25 12:59 IO scheduler benchmarking rwhron
2003-02-25 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-25 5:35 rwhron
2003-02-25 6:38 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 5:23 Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 6:51 ` David Lang
2003-02-21 8:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-21 10:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 10:51 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 11:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 11:17 ` Nick Piggin
2003-02-21 11:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-23 15:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-02-21 11:34 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-02-21 12:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030225215755.GA2038@rushmore \
--to=rwhron@earthlink.net \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.