From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:28:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:28:24 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:53391 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:28:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:21:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030227.122126.30208201.davem@redhat.com> To: bcollins@debian.org Cc: pavel@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de Subject: Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20030227203440.GP21100@phunnypharm.org> References: <20030227202739.GO21100@phunnypharm.org> <20030227.121302.86023203.davem@redhat.com> <20030227203440.GP21100@phunnypharm.org> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Collins Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:34:40 -0500 On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 12:13:02PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: Ben Collins > Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:27:39 -0500 > > Here it is. Sparc64's macros for ioctl32's assumed that cmd was u_int > instead of u_long. This look ok to you, Dave? > > We would love to see that patch :-) It was real small...so small that it slipped through mutt's open() call and never got attached :) Well, you just doubled the size of the table on sparc64. I don't know if I like that.