From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:41:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:41:39 -0500 Received: from blowme.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.140]:64004 "EHLO blowme.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:41:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:51:35 -0500 From: Ben Collins To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list , schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de, davem@redhat.com, arnd@bergmann-dalldorf.de Subject: Re: ioctl32 consolidation -- call for testing Message-ID: <20030227195135.GN21100@phunnypharm.org> References: <20030226222606.GA9144@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030226222606.GA9144@elf.ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 11:26:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > This is next version of ioctl32 consolidation. At one point it > compiled on x86-64 and sparc64. I'm not 100% sure it still does... > > Could you try to apply it on your architecture, fix whatever breakage > it causes, and submit patch back to me? > > ia64 has very different ioctl32 emulation (and very short). What is > going on there? Also not all architectures knew about > register_ioctl32_translation. Ouch. Ok, so it was simple. Do you mind a patch that applies over yours? -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/