From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@digeo.com
Subject: [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 05:39:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030227213954.2125.qmail@linuxmail.org> (raw)
Hi all,
the subject says everything.
I don't post the results that don's show intersting number.
2.4.19
2.5.58
2.5.63
creat-clo 10040 19.4223 19422.31 File Creations and Closes/second
creat-clo 10020 79.7405 79740.52 File Creations and Closes/second
creat-clo 10010 84.3157 84315.68 File Creations and Closes/second
^^^^^ Amazing improvement here
page_test 10000 123.9 210630.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
page_test 10000 102.8 174760.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
page_test 10010 101.898 173226.77 System Allocations & Pages/second
^^^^^Here we are still slowe then 2.4.19
brk_test 10010 48.951 832167.83 System Memory Allocations/second
brk_test 10000 43.7 742900.00 System Memory Allocations/second
brk_test 10020 41.018 697305.39 System Memory Allocations/second
^^^^Slower then .58 and a lot slower then 2.4.19
signal_test 10000 166.1 166100.00 Signal Traps/second
signal_test 10010 156.843 156843.16 Signal Traps/second
signal_test 10000 148.3 148300.00 Signal Traps/second
^^^^Slower then .58 and a lot slower then 2.4.19
exec_test 10000 13.8 69.00 Program Loads/second
exec_test 10030 12.8614 64.31 Program Loads/second
exec_test 10020 12.7745 63.87 Program Loads/second
^^^^ Slower then 2.4.19
fork_test 10000 44.8 4480.00 Task Creations/second
fork_test 10020 24.8503 2485.03 Task Creations/second
fork_test 10000 23.2 2320.00 Task Creations/second
^^^^^ A lot slower then 2.4.19
link_test 10000 155.3 9783.90 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
link_test 10000 135 8505.00 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
link_test 10010 160.739 10126.57 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
^^^^Big improvement here
disk_rw 10060 5.666 29009.94 Random Disk Writes (K)/second
disk_rw 10110 6.42928 32917.90 Random Disk Writes (K)/second
disk_rw 10010 6.39361 32735.26 Random Disk Writes (K)/second
^^^^^Fatser then 2.4.19
sync_disk_rw 16020 0.062422 159.80 Sync Random Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_rw 14600 0.0684932 175.34 Sync Random Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_rw 14410 0.0693963 177.65 Sync Random Disk Writes (K)/second
^^^^ Faster then 2.4.19
array_rtns 10010 13.6863 273.73 Linear Systems Solved/second
array_rtns 10030 13.0608 261.22 Linear Systems Solved/second
array_rtns 10020 11.2774 225.55 Linear Systems Solved/second
^^^^2.5.63 is slower then .58 and slower then 2.4.19
mem_rtns_1 10000 27.7 831000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_1 10000 24.1 723000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_1 10020 22.7545 682634.73 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
^^^^^Slow, slow, slow...
misc_rtns_1 10000 782.2 7822.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 706 7060.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 686.9 6869.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
^^^^ Slow too...
dir_rtns_1 10000 85.8 858000.00 Directory Operations/second
dir_rtns_1 10010 101.598 1015984.02 Directory Operations/second
dir_rtns_1 10010 101.998 1019980.02 Directory Operations/second
^^^^ Fast, really fast
shared_memory 10000 2227.4 222740.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
shared_memory 10000 1973.1 197310.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
shared_memory 10000 1955.2 195520.00 Shared Memory Operations/second
^^^^Slow, slow, slow...
tcp_test 10000 661.7 59553.00 TCP/IP Messages/second
tcp_test 10000 532.7 47943.00 TCP/IP Messages/second
tcp_test 10000 539.3 48537.00 TCP/IP Messages/second
^^^^Debug code, I guess.
udp_test 10000 1182.7 118270.00 UDP/IP DataGrams/second
udp_test 10000 931.5 93150.00 UDP/IP DataGrams/second
udp_test 10000 909.3 90930.00 UDP/IP DataGrams/second
^^^^Debug code, I guess.
fifo_test 10000 1207 120700.00 FIFO Messages/second
fifo_test 10000 997.2 99720.00 FIFO Messages/second
fifo_test 10000 1117.3 111730.00 FIFO Messages/second
^^^^^Faster then 2.5.58 but slower then 2.4.19
stream_pipe 10000 2418.6 241860.00 Stream Pipe Messages/second
stream_pipe 10000 2190 219000.00 Stream Pipe Messages/second
stream_pipe 10000 2176.7 217670.00 Stream Pipe Messages/second
^^^^Still slower then 2.4.19
dgram_pipe 10000 2357.8 235780.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
dgram_pipe 10000 2040 204000.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
dgram_pipe 10000 1978 197800.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
^^^^Debug code, I guess.
pipe_cpy 10000 3918 391800.00 Pipe Messages/second
pipe_cpy 10000 2949.9 294990.00 Pipe Messages/second
pipe_cpy 10000 3123.7 312370.00 Pipe Messages/second
^^^^^Faster then 2.5.58 but slower then 2.4.19
Hope it helps.
Ciao,
Paolo
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-27 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-27 21:39 Paolo Ciarrocchi [this message]
2003-02-27 22:16 ` [BENCHMARK] AIM9 results. 2.4.19 vs 2.5.58 vs 2.5.63 Martin J. Bligh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-01 12:47 Paolo Ciarrocchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030227213954.2125.qmail@linuxmail.org \
--to=ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.