From: "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
To: akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: anticipatory scheduling questions
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:18:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030228121806.16285.qmail@linuxmail.org> (raw)
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:26:04 -0800
To: "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>
Subject: Re: anticipatory scheduling questions
> "Felipe Alfaro Solana" <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> > Indeed, this can be tested interactively with an application like Evolution:
> > I have configured Evolution to use 2 dictionaries (English and Spanish) for
> > spell checking in e-mail messages. When running 2.4.20, if I choose to reply
> > to a large message, it only takes a few seconds to read both dictionaries
> > from disk and perform the spell checking.
> > However, on 2.5.63-mm1 the same process takes considerably longer. Any
> > reason for this?
>
> Could you boot with elevator-deadline and retest?
I have done benchmark tests with Evolution under the following conditions: (times measured since the reply
button is clicked until the message is opened)
2.4.20-2.54 -> 9s
2.5.63-mm1 w/Deadline -> 34s
2.5.63-mm1 w/AS -> 33s
The 2.4.20-2.54 is *not* a stock kernel, but Red Hat's own patched kernel (I think they include most of Alan Cox
patches). Times are measured manually (don't know how to "time" the time elapsed since I click a button and
the reply window is opened). Also, the filesystem is "ext2" running on a laptop (not a really fast hard disk).
> How large are the dictionary files?
Well, the aspell dictionary files are roughly 16MB for the Spanish dictionary and 4MB for the English one.
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
next reply other threads:[~2003-02-28 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 12:18 Felipe Alfaro Solana [this message]
2003-02-28 12:44 ` anticipatory scheduling questions Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-02 21:50 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-02 11:40 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-02 20:43 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-01 14:48 Felipe Alfaro Solana
[not found] <fa.g5ol5kg.cgoq0g@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.hp882fv.1u0orj9@ifi.uio.no>
2003-03-01 12:48 ` Ed Tomlinson
2003-03-01 10:25 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-03-01 10:40 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-01 11:51 ` David Lang
2003-03-01 17:15 ` Alan Cox
2003-02-28 23:12 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-02-28 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-28 14:38 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-02-28 19:14 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-27 22:24 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-02-27 23:26 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030228121806.16285.qmail@linuxmail.org \
--to=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.