From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc-Christian Petersen Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?! Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:34:51 +0100 Message-ID: <200302281334.51153.m.c.p@gmx.net> References: <200302280011.14488.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> <200302281225.21398.tdickenson@devmail.geminidataloggers.co.uk> <200302281434.23346.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <200302281434.23346.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Voicu Liviu , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Friday 28 February 2003 13:34, Voicu Liviu wrote: Hi Voicu, > On Friday 28 February 2003 14:25, Toby Dickenson wrote: > > On Friday 28 February 2003 12:11 pm, Voicu Liviu wrote: > > > Already using this :-) > > > Any way, the system works great but if I change the "nice" value of > > > some process then the CPU almost becomes slave of this process.....= =2E... > > > > If that means the compile finishes faster (and you havent said whethe= r or > > not it does) then isnt using more of the cpu a good thing? > It's ok but this killes my keyboard and really can't do anything else := -( Hmm, this sounds too strange. I cannot see why ext3 does not have this pr= oblem=20 where ReiserFS has a problem, during a kernel compilation. I have a Celeron, 1,3GHz and it doesn't matter what FS I use, if I nice a= =20 kernel compilation to -20, I can still work w/o any strangeness. ciao, Marc