From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ookhoi Subject: Re: ReiserFS causes CPU high usage?! Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:56:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20030228135605.F24291@humilis> References: <200302280011.14488.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> <200302281439.24760.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> <20030228133836.D24291@humilis> <200302281448.20572.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> Reply-To: ookhoi@humilis.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302281448.20572.liviu.voicu@huji.ac.il> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Voicu Liviu Cc: ookhoi@humilis.net, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Voicu Liviu wrote (ao): > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > OK, so in this mashine I compile kde3.1 and this is the output of the "top" > command ( it took me 5 seconds to write top in the command line and another > 10 antill I saw the output...really slow ) > > 35 processes: 31 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped > CPU states: 99.4% user, 0.3% system, 0.0% nice, 0.0% iowait, 0.1% idle > Mem: 255948k av, 250540k used, 5408k free, 0k shrd, 28344k buff > 59512k active, 119096k inactive > Swap: 514072k av, 144k used, 513928k free 122280k > cached > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 889 portage 15 -10 21508 21M 4172 R < 98.9 8.4 0:16 cc1plus > 890 portage 5 -10 2368 2368 752 S < 0.9 0.9 0:00 as > 845 liviu 15 0 1100 1100 792 R 0.1 0.4 0:00 top > 1 root 15 0 484 484 428 S 0.0 0.1 0:05 init In your case, there is no reason to renice the compile to -10, as there are no other processes which take cpu, and therefore there is nothing to gain. I still wonder what could be the reason for the bad response of the keyboard.